45478 – Bacula 1.32f marked unstable by error?

Bug 45478 - Bacula 1.32f marked unstable by error?

Summary: Bacula 1.32f marked unstable by error?

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	x86 Linux

Importance:	High normal (vote)
Assignee:	Chuck Short (RETIRED)

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2004-03-23 01:02 UTC by BlueRaven
Modified:	2004-04-04 22:55 UTC (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description BlueRaven 2004-03-23 01:02:40 UTC

Hi, some time ago I have upgraded my Bacula installation to 1.32f, as soon as it was marked stable for my architecture (x86).
Yesterday I found that Portage wanted to downgrade my installation to 1.29.
I checked ebuilds and found that, in bacula-1.32f.ebuild, x86 was switched to ~x86.
I carefully red the ChangeLog, but couldn't find anything related.
Is it an error or what?

Comment 1 Chuck Short (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2004-03-23 04:21:24 UTC

I could have sworn it was marked stable. Fixed in cvs.