Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 45408 (jhuebel) - Retire: Jason Huebel (jhuebel)
Summary: Retire: Jason Huebel (jhuebel)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: jhuebel
Product: Gentoo Developers/Staff
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Retirement (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Retirement Admin
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-03-22 09:59 UTC by Jon Portnoy (RETIRED)
Modified: 2018-04-20 10:35 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jon Portnoy (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-03-22 09:59:06 UTC
Name: Travis Tilley
Physical location: Connecticut, USA
Email: ttilley@email.com
Areas of responsibility: Gentoo/AMD64
Mentor: avenj and jhuebel

lv has been fairly active for a while -- it would be much appreciated if his mentoring period was ~1 week rather than two
Comment 1 Deedra Waters (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-03-30 09:26:51 UTC
He's set
Comment 2 Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-16 15:56:48 UTC
No cvs og bugs activity since january '05, retiring.
Comment 3 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-16 17:21:25 UTC
Still listed as maintainer of

sys-libs/libstdc++-v3
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-compat
Comment 4 Jason Huebel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-18 21:54:23 UTC
Other members of the amd64 team have taken over support of those packages.  As 
sad as I am to see lv retired for inactivity, he's been inactive for a while 
because of RL work. 
Comment 5 Jason Huebel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-18 21:57:30 UTC
amd64 team, who is responsible for those packages these days? 
Comment 6 Herbie Hopkins (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-19 01:44:13 UTC
I've added myself and removed lv as maintainer from emul-linux-x86-compat.
libstdc++-v3 falls under the toolchain herd and so should be handled by them.

lv: Sorry to see you go.
Comment 7 Jason Huebel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-26 13:10:22 UTC
lv's back and wants to remain a dev. His RL work situation is allowing him to 
become active again. 
 
I'm going to administer the two tests to him due to his extended absence and 
get him back to work. :-)  
Comment 8 Travis Tilley (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-26 13:12:57 UTC
While I have been away for quite some time, I intend to return to the amd64 dev
team in the not too distant future. What needs to be done to un-retire?
Comment 9 Jason Huebel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-26 13:35:29 UTC
You'll need to submit new ebuild and End-of-Mentoring quizzes.  I'll take care 
of looking those over.  Since your accounts were never deactivated, I think it 
would make sense to waive the probation period typical of returning or new 
devs. 
 
What does the rest of recruiters think? 
Comment 10 Mike Doty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-10-26 14:58:46 UTC
I don't see why the probationary period matters; it's only there to prevent
someone from coming on then disappearing and retaining all the goodies that we
give to gentoo devs.
Comment 11 Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-21 15:22:48 UTC
Guys, what's going on here?

If I don't get an update on the situation, say before january, I'm going to turn this bug back to retiring status.
Comment 12 Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-03 15:20:10 UTC
Reverting to retiring status because of lack of updates.
Comment 13 Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-07 09:03:56 UTC
Infra: please retire lv.
Comment 14 Lance Albertson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-07 13:05:32 UTC
Done
Comment 15 Wernfried Haas (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-07 14:36:50 UTC
Retired on forums.
Comment 16 Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-07 15:31:34 UTC
All done.