ee is easy editor. Gentoo's package is app-editors/ee. I think better to remove ee from -ubin, add the keywords in app-editors/ee. # equery b ee * Searching for ee ... sys-freebsd/freebsd-ubin-9.1_rc3 (/usr/bin/ee) Reproducible: Always
Created attachment 329860 [details, diff] patch for freebsd-ubin-9.1_rc3.ebuild
Created attachment 329862 [details, diff] app-editors/ee/files/ee-1.5.2-fbsd.patch signal.h on FreeBSD not defined SIGUNUSED. Following compile error occurs. Compile pass when you apply this sample patch. gmake[1]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/app-editors/ee-1.5.2/work/easyedit-1.5.2' x86_64-gentoo-freebsd9.1-gcc ee.c -o ee -DHAS_UNISTD -DHAS_STDARG -DHAS_STDLIB -DHAS_CTYPE -DHAS_SYS_IOCTL -DHAS_SYS_WAIT -DSLCT_HDR -O2 -pipe -mtune=generic -lcurses ee.c: In function 'main': ee.c:555:30: error: 'SIGUNUSED' undeclared (first use in this function) ee.c:555:30: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in ee.c: In function 'get_options':
Created attachment 329864 [details, diff] patch for app-editors/ee/ee-1.5.2.ebuild
well, if we remove some packages from the system set then it shouldnt need a patch. please check with ee's upstream if they support fbsd first, and make sure they apply your patch. did you diff the ee releases and fbsd ee source code?
(In reply to comment #4) > well, if we remove some packages from the system set then it shouldnt need a > patch. please check with ee's upstream if they support fbsd first, and make > sure they apply your patch. did you diff the ee releases and fbsd ee source > code? ee source code that is included in FreeBSD has been fixed some issues. In addition, it is user-friendly editor included in stages. (see #443810) I think better to keep ee in freebsd-ubin. Sorry for the noise.
