Bug 436436 – =app-arch/zip-3.0-r1 stable request

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Nikoli 2012-09-27 20:05:58 UTC]

Please mark stable zip with natspec patch, unzip with natspec is going stable in bug #420727

[Comment 1 Rafał Mużyło 2012-09-27 20:43:14 UTC]

Not to complain too much, but shouldn't bug 322047 count as a blocker ?
Part of it *is* a crash.

[Comment 2 Nikoli 2012-09-27 20:58:00 UTC]

Is it regression? If yes, for which version? zip-3.0 is stable in bug 287369

[Comment 3 SpanKY 2012-09-28 23:15:11 UTC]

zip-3.0 is stable already, and the bug was reported against that version (3.0-r1 was released after that bug report).  so it's not a regression which means it is not a blocker.

[Comment 4 Rafał Mużyło 2012-09-29 00:09:57 UTC]

While technically not a regression, I've reported this over two years ago, followed by noting it being fixed in the beta finally checking for differences and creating a patch myself three months ago.

While zipnote is a rarely used program, ...honestly...(especially that one of the problems noted there is somewhat akin to that natspec patch)

On semi-related note: bug 420809 (at least its timestamp part) should be even more simple to address already.

[Comment 5 SpanKY 2012-09-29 01:12:57 UTC]

(In reply to comment #4)

not a regression -> not a blocker for stabilization

[Comment 6 Anthony Basile 2012-09-29 01:21:35 UTC]

stable ppc ppc64

[Comment 7 Anthony Basile 2012-10-02 13:03:40 UTC]

stable arm

[Comment 8 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2012-10-02 14:16:47 UTC]

Stable for HPPA.

[Comment 9 mike 2012-10-02 16:08:51 UTC]

x86 ok (repoman ok, compiles ok, usage test ok: compression/decompression of several files)

[Comment 10 Agostino Sarubbo 2012-10-03 10:30:18 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 11 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) 2012-10-17 03:34:49 UTC]

x86 stable

[Comment 12 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2012-10-20 16:41:53 UTC]

alpha/ia64/m68k/s390/sh/sparc stable