Archs, please test and stabilise =app-admin/sxid-4.2. Target KEYWORDS="amd64 ppc sparc x86". Thanks!
Looking at the ebuild, why there is a sed on Makefile.in if you don't call eautoreconf??
+ 18 Aug 2012; Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org> +sxid-4.2-r1.ebuild, + -sxid-4.2.ebuild: + call eautoreconf, improve ebuild syntax, depend. Reopen in a few days, just the time to test it.
(In reply to comment #1) > Looking at the ebuild, why there is a sed on Makefile.in if you don't call > eautoreconf?? Its not gnu autotools so patching Makefile.in without calling autoreconf is okay here. configure will read Makefile.in, substitute the @@ variables and then generate the Makefile. My question is why those DEPENDS.
(In reply to comment #3) > Its not gnu autotools so patching Makefile.in without calling autoreconf is > okay here. configure will read Makefile.in, substitute the @@ variables and > then generate the Makefile. > > My question is why those DEPENDS. It is fine to respect CC instead of tc-export it The new revision looks good for you now?
(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Its not gnu autotools so patching Makefile.in without calling autoreconf is > > okay here. configure will read Makefile.in, substitute the @@ variables and > > then generate the Makefile. > > > > My question is why those DEPENDS. > > It is fine to respect CC instead of tc-export it > > > The new revision looks good for you now? Yes, I think we can proceed.
amd64 stable
x86 stable
sparc keywords dropped
ppc done; closing as last arch