Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 427146 - net-analyzer/ntop - Segfaulting with high load netFlow monitoring
Summary: net-analyzer/ntop - Segfaulting with high load netFlow monitoring
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: Gentoo Netmon project
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-07-18 19:39 UTC by Leonardo Amaral
Modified: 2018-02-14 15:47 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
NTOP GDB output (ntop_gdb,22.51 KB, text/plain)
2012-07-26 19:25 UTC, Leonardo Amaral
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Leonardo Amaral 2012-07-18 19:39:54 UTC
Last stable version of ntop is 5.0.0 and last development version is 5.0.1. 

Also, i'm having constants segfaults using ntop with a high load netflow. The dmesg output is:


[1210992.876493] ntop[14244]: segfault at fffffff7 ip 00006692c5365759 sp 00006692be0eec10 error 4 in libc-2.14.1.so[6692c52ea000+182000]
[1210992.876532] grsec: Segmentation fault occurred at 00000000fffffff7 in /usr/bin/ntop[ntop:14244] uid/euid:102/102 gid/egid:121/121, parent /sbin/init[init:1] uid/euid:0/0 gid/egid:0/0
[1210992.876606] grsec: bruteforce prevention initiated against uid 102, banning for 15 minutes


Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Emerge ntop 4.1.0
2. Configure netFlow with a Cisco version 9 netFlow export
3. Wait a time.
Actual Results:  
Segmentation fault

Expected Results:  
Continuous work
Comment 1 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-07-19 15:21:15 UTC
1) Please post your `emerge --info' output in a comment.
2) Please attach the output of a proper gdb backtrace[1] to this bug report.


[1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/backtraces.xml
Comment 2 Leonardo Amaral 2012-07-20 17:35:57 UTC
Jeroen Roovers, I've initially readded the outdated comment because ntop alets me about this versioning and as i see its not upstream mantained.

Second, I cannot leave GDB attached all time because: 1) Takes a random time to happen 2) My server does not have power enough to register GDB backtrace and process NetFlow from my Cisco - since i got some worriable loads when traffic is near 200mbps or 30kpps and i cant take the risk because this machine is a secondary router - so any slowdown may affect all my ISP providers. Have some another way to debug when i dont need to leave debug actived all time?
Comment 3 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-07-21 13:59:51 UTC
ntop version 5 has not been packaged yet and is not marked as the stable branch upstream. This bug report is about a problem in version 4. If you want an ebuild for an SVN snapshot, then please file a separate bug report to request that.

You don't need to run ntop through gdb to get a backtrace. What you need to do is to set `ulimit -c unlimited' in the init.d script like this:

--- files/ntop-initd    5 Oct 2008 13:08:45 -0000       1.3
+++ files/ntop-initd    21 Jul 2012 13:59:10 -0000
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
        ebegin "Starting ntop"
        export LC_ALL=C # apparently doesn't work with some locales (#191576 and #205382)
        export GDFONTPATH=/usr/share/fonts/corefonts # apparently the only font that works (#231705)
+       ulimit -c unlimited
        start-stop-daemon --start --exec /usr/bin/ntop -- -d -L ${NTOP_OPTS}
        eend $?
 }

and wait for a core dump file (usually named "core") to be placed in ntop's CWD. Then you run `gdb /usr/bin/ntop /path/to/core' to get the backtrace.
Comment 4 Leonardo Amaral 2012-07-22 16:47:04 UTC
Just a comment about versioning: http://sourceforge.net/projects/ntop/files/ntop/Stable/ have ntop-5.0.

Ill try to do this when my server get lower usage.
Comment 5 Leonardo Amaral 2012-07-26 15:06:18 UTC
Ive tryed to do this:

lorenz portage # grep ulimit /etc/init.d/ntop 
	ulimit -c unlimited

lorenz portage # grep "core     unlimited" /etc/security/limits.conf 
*	soft	core	unlimited

lorenz portage # sysctl -a 2>&1 | grep core_pattern
kernel.core_pattern = /cores/%e.core

lorenz portage # ls -lah /cores/
total 4.0K
drwxrwxrwx  2 root root    6 Jul 24 21:29 .
drwxr-xr-x 22 root root 4.0K Jul 24 21:29 ..

lorenz portage # nm /usr/bin/ntop |wc -l
141

lorenz portage # file /usr/bin/ntop 
/usr/bin/ntop: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, not stripped

And no core files. Tryed run direct, but:


lorenz portage # gdb /usr/bin/ntop 
GNU gdb (Gentoo 7.3.1 p2) 7.3.1
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-pc-linux-gnu".
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://bugs.gentoo.org/>...
Reading symbols from /usr/bin/ntop...done.
(gdb) run -d -L -u ntop -P /var/lib/ntop
Starting program: /usr/bin/ntop -d -L -u ntop -P /var/lib/ntop
Thu Jul 26 12:03:53 2012  NOTE: Interface merge enabled by default
Thu Jul 26 12:03:53 2012  Initializing gdbm databases
[Inferior 1 (process 28538) exited normally]
(gdb) 

Tryed to run with debug and nofork, the process is inside GDB. When it get a kill, ill try to do something. But im worried: Why can't i generate core files?
Comment 6 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-07-26 17:18:54 UTC
If it segfaulted in the mean time, then it should have dumped a core file *somewhere*.
Comment 7 Leonardo Amaral 2012-07-26 19:25:27 UTC
Created attachment 319320 [details]
NTOP GDB output
Comment 8 Leonardo Amaral 2012-07-26 19:25:39 UTC
Added GDB Output.
Comment 9 Sergey Popov (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-09-25 17:27:26 UTC
Maybe --disable-sessions can help in this case, according to http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ntop.general/16754/match=segfault ?
Comment 10 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2018-02-14 15:47:09 UTC
removed from the tree