But, as it's normal because this is a bin package, why don't hide that warnings with QA_DT_HASH? Thanks Reproducible: Always
I reminded it in the last stabilization, nobody cares :P
(In reply to comment #0) > But, as it's normal because this is a bin package, why don't hide that > warnings with QA_DT_HASH? > > Thanks > > Reproducible: Always if you tell me how I'll do it. Since I don't have this warning configured (?) I don't see the error. Also I think there's better solution than listing everything in QA_DT_HASH but can't remember what exactly. (In reply to comment #1) > I reminded it in the last stabilization, nobody cares :P Can't find that bug right now.
(In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > But, as it's normal because this is a bin package, why don't hide that > > warnings with QA_DT_HASH? > > > > Thanks > > > > Reproducible: Always > > if you tell me how I'll do it. I would do it like in other ebuilds, see for example emul-linux-x86-baselibs-20120520.ebuild ;) >Since I don't have this warning configured > (?) I don't see the error. You need to append: LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -Wl,--hash-style=gnu" to your make.conf :) >Also I think there's better solution than listing > everything in QA_DT_HASH but can't remember what exactly. Maybe we could ask portage people :/, ok to CC them? > > (In reply to comment #1) > > I reminded it in the last stabilization, nobody cares :P > > Can't find that bug right now.
The idea would be to add that files to QA_DT_HASH, you can use "*" as emul packages do: QA_DT_HASH="usr/lib32/.*"
Fixed with QA_PREBUILT in 6.1.11.5 and 7.2.3.3, thanks.