Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 413157 - Please stabilize dev-java/jna-3.4.0
Summary: Please stabilize dev-java/jna-3.4.0
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Keywording and Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Java team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on:
Blocks: 414387
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2012-04-22 21:20 UTC by Miroslav Šulc
Modified: 2012-06-07 21:18 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Miroslav Šulc gentoo-dev 2012-04-22 21:20:12 UTC
23 Mar 2012; Ralph Sennhauser <sera@gentoo.org> jna-3.4.0.ebuild:
  Fix running tests. #294289

  23 Mar 2012; Ralph Sennhauser <sera@gentoo.org> jna-3.4.0.ebuild:
  Use vcs-snapshot eclass for github download.
  Don't use xargs and also remove bundled libffi.
  Drop libffi symlink workaround.

  22 Mar 2012; Ralph Sennhauser <sera@gentoo.org> jna-3.0.3-r1.ebuild,
  jna-3.2.4.ebuild, jna-3.2.7.ebuild, jna-3.3.0.ebuild, jna-3.4.0.ebuild:
  Add missing build dep dev-util/pkgconfig. #403577

*jna-3.4.0 (25 Dec 2011)

  25 Dec 2011; Miroslav Šulc <fordfrog@gentoo.org>
  +files/3.4.0-build.xml.patch, +jna-3.4.0.ebuild,
  +files/3.4.0-makefile-flags.patch, metadata.xml:
  Version bump. Added new USE flags, awt and nio-buffers. awt USE flag should
  require X USE flag on used JDK/JRE but we do not have this flag on virtuals
  yet.


it is also blocker for netbeans stabilization.
Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2012-04-23 14:49:02 UTC
@fordfrog/java:

I'm not guru in java build, but seems:

1)gcc is called directly
2)CFLAGS="-O" is overwrited

Can you check please?
Comment 2 Miroslav Šulc gentoo-dev 2012-04-23 15:07:18 UTC
well, i'm not experienced with native builds, so i am not able to fix it.

if i can see right, it seems to me these things did not change from previous releases which were stabilized too. but maybe these issues were just overlooked.

is it a stabilization blocker or not? if it is not blocker, i suggest we stabilize the package and file new bug with the issues mentioned. otherwise we would have to fix it now and postpone netbeans stabilization.
Comment 3 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2012-04-23 15:08:29 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> is it a stabilization blocker or not? if it is not blocker, i suggest we
> stabilize the package and file new bug with the issues mentioned. otherwise
> we would have to fix it now and postpone netbeans stabilization.

No, not a regression/blocker, is just to ask.
Comment 4 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2012-04-23 15:46:17 UTC
amd64 stable
Comment 5 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-05-07 06:26:12 UTC
x86 stable
Comment 6 Brent Baude (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-06-07 21:18:24 UTC
ppc done; closing as last arch