Bug 412395 – app-portage/portpeek should support USE flags per individual SLOT

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Daniel Perzynski 2012-04-17 18:18:49 UTC]

when running portpeek 

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. portpeek -s
2.
3.
Actual Results:  
 portpeek -s

package.use:
use flag: colord is invalid for : x11-libs/gtk+-2.24.10-r1
use flag: X is invalid for : x11-libs/gtk+-2.24.10-r1
use flag: libffi is invalid for : dev-python/pygobject-3.2.0
use flag: dbus is invalid for : dev-libs/libunique-3.0.2
use flag: apng is invalid for : media-libs/libpng-1.2.49
use flag: static-libs is invalid for : media-libs/libpng-1.2.49
Done


Expected Results:  
package.use:

Done


There are 2 different sets of use flags for the same package in different slot

[I] media-libs/libpng
     Available versions:  
	(1.2)	1.2.47 1.2.49
	(0)	1.5.8 1.5.9 1.5.10
	{{apng neon static-libs}}
     Installed versions:  1.2.49(1.2)(08:40:23 AM 03/31/2012) 1.5.10(08:40:09 AM 03/31/2012)(apng static-libs -neon)
     Homepage:            http://www.libpng.org/
     Description:         Portable Network Graphics library

for example libpng at 1.2 slot does not have any useflags but 0 slot have apng static-libs and neon. portpeek is checking against version 1.2.49 and those use flags are treated as invalid for that version. It is true but only for that particular slot only

[Comment 1 Mike Pagano 2012-04-19 18:43:24 UTC]

Can you attach the package.use you used for the below example?

[Comment 2 Daniel Perzynski 2012-04-20 17:50:46 UTC]

Created attachment 309647 [details]
package.use

[Comment 3 Mike Pagano 2012-04-20 20:46:05 UTC]

Created attachment 309671 [details]
portpeek 2.0.21

Can you test this version, please?

[Comment 4 Daniel Perzynski 2012-04-20 21:24:30 UTC]

It is better now but still 2 have been reported

./portpeek -s

package.use:
use flag: dbus is invalid for : dev-libs/libunique-3.0.2
use flag: libffi is invalid for : dev-python/pygobject-3.2.0
Done

[Comment 5 Daniel Perzynski 2012-04-20 21:28:40 UTC]

You have fixed scenario when higher version has extra use flags but we need also a fix for the opposite.

[Comment 6 Mike Pagano 2012-04-20 23:11:25 UTC]

Example packages?

[Comment 7 Mike Pagano 2012-04-20 23:13:51 UTC]

Nevermind, I see your previous comment

[Comment 8 Mike Pagano 2012-04-22 19:15:56 UTC]

Created attachment 309803 [details]
portpeek 2.0.22 Refactor of package.use function for non atom packages

Can you test this version?

I have refactored the way portpeek handles the package.use packages that have no atom.

You seem like a smart guy, and I know I am telling you this late, but you may want to backup your files in /etc/portage when testing. :)

[Comment 9 Daniel Perzynski 2012-04-22 21:07:06 UTC]

I have run -a with -d. It looks like logic is all correct now.

parse_package_use: Line: x11-libs/gtk+ xinerama colord X
ENTERED check_useflags_all_versions: x11-libs/gtk+
check_useflags_all_versions: package: x11-libs/gtk+-3.4.1
package_string is x11-libs/gtk+
found valid flag: xinerama
found valid flag: colord
found valid flag: X
check_useflags_all_versions: package: x11-libs/gtk+-2.24.10-r1
package_string is x11-libs/gtk+
found valid flag: xinerama
found invalid flag: colord
found invalid flag: X

end result is

package.use:

Done

[Comment 10 Mike Pagano 2012-04-23 12:42:33 UTC]

Released in portpeek 2.0.22. Thanks for your help, Daniel.