Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 408397 - =media-libs/glew-1.5.6 malformed pkgconfig
Summary: =media-libs/glew-1.5.6 malformed pkgconfig
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Tim Harder
URL: http://glew.sourceforge.net/
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-03-15 18:53 UTC by Julian Ospald
Modified: 2012-03-15 21:37 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
glew-1.5.6.ebuild.diff (glew.diff,528 bytes, patch)
2012-03-15 18:53 UTC, Julian Ospald
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Julian Ospald 2012-03-15 18:53:17 UTC
Created attachment 305543 [details, diff]
glew-1.5.6.ebuild.diff

this version still has a malformed "pkgconfig/glew.pc" which is fixed in 1.6.0-r1

# pkg-config glew --libs --cflags
-I/var/tmp/portage/media-libs/glew-1.5.6/image//usr/include/GL  -L/var/tmp/portage/media-libs/glew-1.5.6/image//usr/lib64 -lGLEW

attached patch fixes this:

# pkg-config glew --libs --cflags
-I/usr/include/GL  -lGLEW
Comment 1 Julian Ospald 2012-03-15 18:59:25 UTC
please dont remove that version from portage, there are still some apps which wont compile with >=1.6.0
Comment 2 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-03-15 19:15:42 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> please dont remove that version from portage, there are still some apps
> which wont compile with >=1.6.0

I couldn't find any open bugs so should be good.
Comment 3 Julian Ospald 2012-03-15 19:50:01 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> I couldn't find any open bugs so should be good.

yeah, but why remove it

I would like to optionally depend on it with a package, but that is not in portage. ( https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290294 )

otherwise i would have to re-add it to sunrise
Comment 4 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-03-15 21:37:05 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > I couldn't find any open bugs so should be good.
> 
> yeah, but why remove it
> 
> I would like to optionally depend on it with a package, but that is not in
> portage. ( https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290294 )
> 
> otherwise i would have to re-add it to sunrise

glew is not slotted and 1.6.0 is marked stable so depending on it is not acceptable in any case.   i've removed the broken version from tree now.