Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 408043 - mail-filter/amavisd-new with snmp-use flag should check for net-analyzer/net-snmp perl use-flag
Summary: mail-filter/amavisd-new with snmp-use flag should check for net-analyzer/net-...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal minor (vote)
Assignee: Net-Mail Packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-03-13 16:54 UTC by Oleg Gawriloff
Modified: 2012-03-14 09:34 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Oleg Gawriloff 2012-03-13 16:54:42 UTC 
Without net-analyzer/net-snmp compiled with perl use flag we have following error when starting amavisd-snmp-subagent:

martin-cl2 ~ # amavisd-snmp-subagent --help
Can't locate NetSNMP/OID.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/lib64/perl5/s                                                              ite_perl/5.12.4/x86_64-linux /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.12.4 /usr/lib64/perl5/                                                              vendor_perl/5.12.4/x86_64-linux /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.12.4 /usr/lib64/p                                                              erl5/site_perl /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5/5.12.4/x86_64-linux                                                               /usr/lib64/perl5/5.12.4 /usr/local/lib/site_perl) at /usr/sbin/amavisd-snmp-sub                                                              agent line 125.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/sbin/amavisd-snmp-subagent line 125.


Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Eray Aslan gentoo-dev 2012-03-14 09:34:24 UTC 
+  14 Mar 2012; Eray Aslan <eras@gentoo.org> amavisd-new-2.7.0.ebuild:
+  Fix net-snmp DEPEND - bug #408043
+

Thanks for the report.