Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 405791 - x11-misc/lightdm-gtk-greeter USE=branding deletes all config settings
Summary: x11-misc/lightdm-gtk-greeter USE=branding deletes all config settings
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: Markos Chandras (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-02-25 17:32 UTC by A. Person
Modified: 2012-02-28 16:37 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description A. Person 2012-02-25 17:32:02 UTC
Previously, USE="-branding" would remove the Gentoo background image from lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf, but now it removes all config from that file.
Comment 1 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-02-27 16:42:19 UTC
I don't understand your request. Are you saying that the greeter config file installed by USE=branding is incomplete?
Comment 2 A. Person 2012-02-27 17:24:40 UTC
If I have USE="branding", I get this config file:

[greeter]
background=/usr/share/lightdm/backgrounds/gentoo1024x768.png
theme-name=Adwaita
icon-name=gnome
cursor-name=gnome
font-name=Cantarell 11
xft-antialias=true
xft-dpi=96
xft-hintstyle=hintslight
xft-rgba=rgb

If I have USE="-branding", I get this config file:

[greeter]
#background=
#show-language-selector=false
#theme-name=
#font-name=
#xft-antialias=
#xft-dpi=
#xft-hintstyle=
#xft-rgba=
Comment 3 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-02-27 17:28:46 UTC
Ok so? The "branding" useflag offers a customized (or Gentoo specific if you like) greeter. There is nothing wrong with that. If you don't like this, then don't use this use flag and use the vanilla greeter instead.
Comment 4 A. Person 2012-02-28 16:37:35 UTC
Well, it's a change in behavior compared to the last version in which the branding USE flag only determined which background image was specified in the config file.  I guess I mistook it for a bug.