Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 403703 - dev-libs/gmp-5.0.4 fails to compile
Summary: dev-libs/gmp-5.0.4 fails to compile
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo/Alt
Classification: Unclassified
Component: FreeBSD (show other bugs)
Hardware: All FreeBSD
: Normal normal
Assignee: Gentoo/BSD Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-02-14 21:19 UTC by Dmitri Bogomolov
Modified: 2012-03-12 10:19 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
build.log (build.log,354.44 KB, text/plain)
2012-02-14 21:19 UTC, Dmitri Bogomolov
Details
mpn/popcount.c (popcount.c,3.12 KB, text/plain)
2012-03-09 09:53 UTC, Dmitri Bogomolov
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Dmitri Bogomolov 2012-02-14 21:19:50 UTC
Created attachment 301967 [details]
build.log

Problem is in mpn/popcount.c

libtool: compile:  i686-gentoo-freebsd8.2-gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -O2 -march=i686 -mtune=i686 -pipe -c mpn/popcount.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o mpn/.libs/popcount.o
mpn/popcount.c: In function 'FNAME':
mpn/popcount.c:49:7: warning: implicit declaration of function 'POPHAM'
mpn/popcount.c:49:27: error: 'vp' undeclared (first use in this function)
mpn/popcount.c:49:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
gmake[2]: *** [mpn/popcount.lo] Error 1
gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/gmp-5.0.4/work/gmp-5.0.4'
gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/gmp-5.0.4/work/gmp-5.0.4'
gmake: *** [all] Error 2
emake failed
Comment 1 Naohiro Aota gentoo-dev 2012-03-08 12:53:53 UTC
No problem here. Could you upload that mpn/popcount.c please?
Comment 2 Dmitri Bogomolov 2012-03-09 09:53:21 UTC
Created attachment 304719 [details]
mpn/popcount.c

That's it. But now I see dev-libs/gmp-5.0.4 installed on my test machine 28.02. Maybe problem was in other package.
Comment 3 Dmitri Bogomolov 2012-03-12 10:19:48 UTC
Not reproducible I think. Excuse me please.