401699 – absent package(s) are masked in package.mask file

Bug 401699 - absent package(s) are masked in package.mask file

Summary: absent package(s) are masked in package.mask file

Status:	RESOLVED OBSOLETE

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal QA (vote)
Assignee:	Gentoo Quality Assurance Team

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2012-01-31 21:08 UTC by zvasylvv
Modified:	2020-05-10 07:50 UTC (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
package.mask.patch (401699-mask,1.91 KB, patch) 2012-01-31 22:33 UTC, Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED)	Details \| Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description zvasylvv 2012-01-31 21:08:28 UTC

dev-java/netx package is absent in portage tree. however it still present in profiles/package.mask file.

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 zvasylvv 2012-01-31 21:10:18 UTC

same for 


# Miroslav Šulc <fordfrog@gentoo.org> (19 Oct 2011)
# Masked for removal on 19 Nov 2011
# Bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377967
# Replaced by dev-java/jnlp-api
dev-java/jnlp-bin

Comment 2 zvasylvv 2012-01-31 21:19:49 UTC

also

app-misc/openjnlp
media-tv/vdr-dvd-scripts
media-tv/vdrplugin-rebuild
centreon


Its possible that =media-plugins/xbmc-addon-vdr-9999 is also non existant, but more looks like its a typo (should be xbmc-addon-xvdr)

Comment 3 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2012-01-31 21:30:08 UTC

Are you aware that developers can check these from

http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/
http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/invalid-mask.txt

?

Comment 4 zvasylvv 2012-01-31 21:35:58 UTC

No, I do not. I am in process of developing another software^W 'bicycle' :) that except other stuff shows also this info..

Comment 5 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2012-01-31 22:33:56 UTC

Created attachment 300573 [details, diff]
package.mask.patch

Comment 6 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2012-01-31 22:34:39 UTC

(In reply to comment #3)
> Are you aware that developers can check these from
> 
> http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/
> http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/invalid-mask.txt

Maybe QA people should file bug reports.

Comment 7 Christian Ruppert (idl0r) gentoo-dev

2012-02-01 17:55:35 UTC

(In reply to comment #5)
> Created attachment 300573 [details, diff] [details, diff]
> package.mask.patch

Jer, feel free to commit :)

(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Are you aware that developers can check these from
> > 
> > http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/
> > http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/invalid-mask.txt
> 
> Maybe QA people should file bug reports.

Hm, please rename that bug afterwards or file a new one. I may write a script for it.