401519 – =dev-libs/stlsoft-1.10.1_alpha15 version bump

Bug 401519 - =dev-libs/stlsoft-1.10.1_alpha15 version bump

Summary: =dev-libs/stlsoft-1.10.1_alpha15 version bump

Status:	RESOLVED INVALID

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee:	Dmitriy Vilkov

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2012-01-30 14:11 UTC by Dmitriy Vilkov
Modified:	2012-03-24 09:47 UTC (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Ebuild (stlsoft-1.10.1_alpha.ebuild,466 bytes, text/plain) 2012-01-30 14:12 UTC, Dmitriy Vilkov	Details
Ebuild (stlsoft-1.10.1_alpha15.ebuild,466 bytes, text/plain) 2012-01-31 09:07 UTC, Dmitriy Vilkov	Details
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Dmitriy Vilkov 2012-01-30 14:11:33 UTC

Hello, would you please add this ebuild to the portage tree (dev-libs/stlsoft).

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Dmitriy Vilkov 2012-01-30 14:12:25 UTC

Created attachment 300391 [details]
Ebuild

Comment 2 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2012-01-30 20:28:39 UTC

Comment on attachment 300391 [details]
Ebuild

You should probably put the alpha build number/version in the ebuild's name.

Comment 3 Dmitriy Vilkov 2012-01-31 09:07:21 UTC

Created attachment 300513 [details]
Ebuild

(In reply to comment #2)
> Comment on attachment 300391 [details]
> Ebuild
> 
> You should probably put the alpha build number/version in the ebuild's name.

You are right. Here it is.

Comment 4 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2012-02-03 22:31:54 UTC

Is there a reason to boot an alpha version in portage? Maybe it is too unstable or even unusable at this point?

Comment 5 Dmitriy Vilkov 2012-02-04 08:06:38 UTC

(In reply to comment #4)
> Is there a reason to boot an alpha version in portage? Maybe it is too unstable
> or even unusable at this point?

Recently I've tested some features which I didn't used in this version and I think you are right it is not stable yet.
There is only few stable things, basicly from 1.9 branch. It's sad, but yeah we should wait a little more.

Comment 6 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2012-03-24 09:47:58 UTC

Ok thanks. Closing as INVALID as I don't feel comfortable to put an _alpha version in portage. Please open a new bug once a stable (or even beta) release is out ;)