Is it OK to stabilize =dev-libs/gf2x-1.0-r1 ? If so, please CC arches and add STABLEREQ keyword. Stabilization of this package has been repoman-checked on the following arches: x86, amd64
Thanks for the report, I will work on it.
(In reply to comment #1) > Thanks for the report, I will work on it. What do you mean with "working on it"? ntl and Macaulay2 are rdeps and they seem to work fine with 1.0. I'd say it's good to go.
(In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Thanks for the report, I will work on it. > > What do you mean with "working on it"? Don't add arches directly, as it was done before. It is always a good point to review the complete abuild, add dies, missing deps etc because otherwise AT ( -> agostino) will request it.
So this would be one question, is it good to set in public space $PID? might there be some place where this with PID=processid?
+ 24 Jan 2012; Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org> gf2x-1.0-r1.ebuild, + metadata.xml: + EAPI BUMP to 4, drop src_install as it is handled by default function, rename + $PID to PACKAGEID + arches please go ahead, testsuite included.
(In reply to comment #3) > Don't add arches directly, as it was done before. It is always a good point to > review the complete abuild, add dies, missing deps etc because otherwise AT ( > -> agostino) will request it. Bug 400777 :-)
amd64 is ok
amd64 stable
x86 stable
ppc done; closing as last arch
