Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 398035 - net-misc/asterisk-chan_capi ebuild for asterisk 10
Summary: net-misc/asterisk-chan_capi ebuild for asterisk 10
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: Default Assignee for New Packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-01-07 16:14 UTC by pi
Modified: 2012-01-09 15:55 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
simple ebuild to install asterisk-chan_capi from svn (asterisk-chan_capi-9999.ebuild,1.81 KB, text/plain)
2012-01-07 16:16 UTC, pi 		Details
nett-misc/asterisk-chan_capi-9999.ebuild (asterisk-chan_capi-9999.ebuild,1.81 KB, text/plain)
2012-01-07 16:18 UTC, pi 		Details
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description pi 2012-01-07 16:14:31 UTC 
Since introducing net-misc/asterisk-1.8 and the removal of net-misc/asterisk-chan_capi-1.1.4.ebuild from the tree (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376273) gentoo no longer supports chan_capi within asterisk.

Reproducible: Always



Expected Results:  
Actual SVN versions of chan_capi have full support for newer asterisk versions. An updated ebuild will be needed to get capi support back.

I successfully tested net-misc/asterisk-10.0.0 with revision 946 of chan_capi.
Comment 1 pi 2012-01-07 16:16:44 UTC 
Created attachment 298239 [details]
simple ebuild to install asterisk-chan_capi from svn
Comment 2 pi 2012-01-07 16:18:54 UTC 
Created attachment 298241 [details]
nett-misc/asterisk-chan_capi-9999.ebuild
Comment 3 Tony Vroon (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-01-09 15:55:44 UTC 
"Live" SVN ebuilds are not acceptable for use in the portage tree. As support is offered, each ebuild must install the very same set of files. I would suggest that you petition upstream to offer release tarballs with a version number, as is the accepted practice.
Once a release tarball is available, please do feel free to reopen this report and attach an ebuild.