Bug 396675 – dev-ruby/coffee-rails-3.1.1 and dependencies keywording request

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Hans de Graaff 2012-01-01 14:02:03 UTC]

coffee-rails is part of the default asset pipeline for Rails 3.1. While it is possible to run rails without it it is included in the default setup for new Rails projects. My intention is to add a revision of dev-ruby/rails with a USE flag to pull this dependency (and other similar ones) in. Please test and keyword:

=dev-ruby/coffee-script-source-1.2.0
=dev-ruby/coffee-script-2.2.0
=dev-ruby/coffee-rails-3.1.1

[Comment 1 Thomas Kahle (RETIRED) 2012-03-05 10:09:33 UTC]

depends on sinatra (and other stuff) I assume you want us to hunt down the dep-chain and keyword everything in sight? *sigh*

[Comment 2 Hans de Graaff 2012-03-06 19:24:22 UTC]

(In reply to comment #1)
> depends on sinatra (and other stuff) I assume you want us to hunt down the
> dep-chain and keyword everything in sight? *sigh*

I don't see how this package depends on sinatra at all. I *did* forget to add the keywording bug for rails that needs to be done first. Apologies for the oversight, and feel free to refer bugs back to us if we miss dependencies.

[Comment 3 Thomas Kahle (RETIRED) 2012-03-06 22:36:11 UTC]

(In reply to comment #2)
> I don't see how this package depends on sinatra at all. I *did* forget to
> add the keywording bug for rails that needs to be done first. Apologies for
> the oversight, and feel free to refer bugs back to us if we miss
> dependencies.

Hmm, probably my mistake. I really lost perspective with the ruby keywording :(
Still, execjs is a dep that is not listed (x86 did this in bug 397435)
x86 is still not cc'ed on bug 396547, is that intentional?

[Comment 4 Hans de Graaff 2012-03-07 18:43:13 UTC]

(In reply to comment #3)

> Still, execjs is a dep that is not listed (x86 did this in bug 397435)

Now fixed.

> x86 is still not cc'ed on bug 396547, is that intentional?

No, fixed as well.

[Comment 5 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2012-05-05 18:43:03 UTC]

ia64/sparc keywords dropped

[Comment 6 Thomas Kahle (RETIRED) 2012-05-17 10:58:49 UTC]

x86 done.

[Comment 7 Agostino Sarubbo 2012-12-17 20:53:03 UTC]

Repoman complains because wants a lot of not keyworded packages, so please make an exactly list and set the correctly Depends on / blocks, then CC back ppc*

[Comment 8 Hans de Graaff 2015-07-07 07:05:39 UTC]

Closing this bug since we have had no user requests in the past 3 years and currently no rails versions are keyworded for ppc/ppc64.