Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 395371 - dev-util/catalyst: create make.conf in /etc/portage/
Summary: dev-util/catalyst: create make.conf in /etc/portage/
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal enhancement
Assignee: Gentoo Catalyst Developers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 394461
Blocks: 427860
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2011-12-20 15:47 UTC by Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED)
Modified: 2012-09-28 10:37 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
POC patch (0002-s-etc-make.conf-etc-portage-make.conf-g-Use-new-loca.patch,17.75 KB, patch)
2011-12-20 15:47 UTC, Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED)
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2011-12-20 15:47:19 UTC
Created attachment 296451 [details, diff]
POC patch

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #394461 +++

Here is a POC patch to move the make.conf file to /etc/portage/
Comment 1 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2012-03-06 16:29:39 UTC
+*catalyst-2.0.7.1-r1 (06 Mar 2012)
+
+  06 Mar 2012; Jeremy Olexa <darkside@gentoo.org>
+  +files/0001-Add-new-T-purgetmponly-option.patch,
+  +files/0001-add-etc-make.profile-to-cleanables-too.patch,
+  +files/0002-s-etc-make.conf-etc-portage-make.conf-g-Use-new-loca.patch,
+  +catalyst-2.0.7.1-r1.ebuild,
+  +files/0001-s-etc-make.profile-etc-portage-make.profile-g-Use-ne.patch:
+  Revbump catalyst to include 3 patches ACK'd by team, bugs 394461, 395371,
+  406599

Somehow one or more patches did not apply cleanly to catalyst_2 branch. I don't understand the branching scheme there so I didn't fix it (yet).
Comment 2 Matt Turner gentoo-dev 2012-05-02 20:13:59 UTC
Looks like the patches are in catalyst_2, but not master. Is that what you meant?
Comment 3 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2012-05-07 21:59:50 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Looks like the patches are in catalyst_2, but not master. Is that what you
> meant?

Well, actually, it was never applied to catalyst_2
Comment 4 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-08-29 03:37:19 UTC
I've added the desired support to catalyst. I've been testing it for a while and will do a release with this soon.
Comment 5 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-09-28 10:37:54 UTC
I've released and marked stable catalyst-2.0.11 that fixes this issue.