Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 39381 - Testing thoughts on some packages marked ~pcc
Summary: Testing thoughts on some packages marked ~pcc
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: PPC Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: PPC Porters
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-01-25 13:40 UTC by REdOG
Modified: 2006-02-04 06:04 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description REdOG 2004-01-25 13:40:37 UTC
CFLAGS="-mcpu=7450 -O2 -pipe -fsigned-char -maltivec -mabi=altivec -mpowerpc-gfxopt"

I did my emerge  system on: Jun 14, 2003 18:32:19 : on my g4 powerbook ti3 
I setup all my favorite app and then changed ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~ppc"(in make.conf) emerged kde openoffice and several other apps. I then changed ACCEPT_KEYWORDS back to commented out and fixed issues as they arose reverting to stable packages when I had to. So these packages that I list here are those I think could be marked ppc. There are several others I would list here but I think the others would be contraversial enough to need thier own bugs for suggestions of this nature. 

libtool-1.4.3-r2
ttmkfdir-3.0.9
miscfiles-1.3-r1 
libperl-5.8.1
perl-5.8.1-r1
gawk-3.1.3
pam-login-3.12-r1
util-linux-2.12
readline-4.3-r5
ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.16-r1
devfsd-1.3.25-r5
file-4.03 
fileutils-4.1.11-r2
sh-utils-2.0.15-r1
textutils-2.1-r1
which-2.16
slang-1.4.9

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.install 
2.play break it fix it break it fix it play
3.file bug reports

Actual Results:  
Gentoo Rocks

Expected Results:  
World domination

my 2cents
Comment 1 Bartosch Pixa (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-02-15 05:10:31 UTC
most of these are either already stable or even superseded by newer versions, still there's quite some stuff in this list that i consider core packages, luca any comments ?
Comment 2 REdOG 2004-04-27 07:53:26 UTC
Old bug; packages have sufficiently progressed.