Is it OK to stabilize =app-i18n/im-freewnn-0.0.2-r1 ? If so, please CC arches and add STABLEREQ keyword. Stabilization of this package has been repoman-checked on the following arches: x86, amd64
Added tiny QA fix. Now please mark stable. KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86"
@naota Missing glib and pango as RDEPEND Please remove /usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-freewnn.la if is not necessary. amd64 ok
x86 stable
amd64 stable
(In reply to comment #2) > @naota > Missing glib and pango as RDEPEND added. > Please remove /usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-freewnn.la if is not > necessary. The .la file has "shouldnotlink=yes" and so I think it won't harm. I don't drop it.
+ 12 Feb 2012; Tony Vroon <chainsaw@gentoo.org> im-freewnn-0.0.2-r1.ebuild: + Marked stable on PPC64 as requested by Paweł Hajdan, Jr. in bug #392875. + Compile tested on a PowerMac7,3 (64UL) with GCC 4.5.3.
ppc done; closing as last arch