Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 39144 - Qmail MD5 checksums on qmail-maildir++.patch not uptodate
Summary: Qmail MD5 checksums on qmail-maildir++.patch not uptodate
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Server (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High blocker (vote)
Assignee: Net-Mail Packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-01-23 03:17 UTC by Richard Reynolds
Modified: 2004-03-06 18:26 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Richard Reynolds 2004-01-23 03:17:10 UTC
emerging qmail results in a failure because of qmail-maildir++.patch. Others have reported the same proble on the forums 


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge -v qmail
2.
3.

Actual Results:  
db root # emerge qmail
Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 1) net-mail/qmail-1.03-r13 to /
>>> md5 src_uri qmail-1.03.tar.gz
>>> md5 src_uri qmailqueue-patch
>>> md5 src_uri big-todo.103.patch
>>> md5 src_uri qmail-link-sync.patch
>>> md5 src_uri big-concurrency.patch
>>> md5 src_uri qmail-0.0.0.0.patch
>>> md5 src_uri sendmail-flagf.patch
>>> md5 src_uri qmail-1.03-qmtpc.patch
>>> md5 src_uri qmail-smtpd-relay-reject
>>> md5 src_uri qmail-local-tabs.patch

!!! File is corrupt or incomplete. (Digests do not match)
>>> our recorded digest: 7553829a93411cdaffce31a29323697f
>>> your file's digest: 413be7bb5b407c2964c3275c4d596947
!!! File does not exist: /usr/portage/distfiles//qmail-maildir++.patch

db root # ls -l /usr/portage/distfiles/qmail-*
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root portage 450 Aug 5 08:10 /usr/portage/distfiles/qmail-0.0.0.0.patch
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root portage 6197 Aug 5 08:10
/usr/portage/distfiles/qmail-1.03-qmtpc.patch
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root portage 1129 Sep 24 01:40
/usr/portage/distfiles/qmail-1.03-reread-concurrency.2.patch
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root portage 220668 Aug 5 08:10
/usr/portage/distfiles/qmail-1.03.tar.gz
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root portage 2104 Mar 24 2003 /usr/portage/distfiles/qmail-103.patch
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root portage 2603 Aug 13 19:42
/usr/portage/distfiles/qmail-date-localtime.patch.txt
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root portage 4524 Sep 24 00:10
/usr/portage/distfiles/qmail-gentoo-1.03-r12-badrcptto-morebadrcptto-accdias.diff.bz2
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root portage 1753 Aug 13 19:42
/usr/portage/distfiles/qmail-limit-bounce-size.patch.txt
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root portage 1403 Aug 5 08:10
/usr/portage/distfiles/qmail-link-sync.patch
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root portage 505 Aug 5 08:10
/usr/portage/distfiles/qmail-local-tabs.patch
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root portage 43512 Jan 20 04:40
/usr/portage/distfiles/qmail-maildir++.patch
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root portage 401 Sep 24 01:40
/usr/portage/distfiles/qmail-popupnofd2close.patch
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root portage 1287 Jun 27 2002
/usr/portage/distfiles/qmail-remote-auth-patch-doc.txt
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root portage 1230 Aug 5 08:10
/usr/portage/distfiles/qmail-smtpd-relay-reject
db root 


A bypass is:

ebuild /usr/portage/net-mail/qmail/qmail-1.03-r13.ebuild digest
emerge qmail
Comment 1 Robin Johnson archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2004-01-23 06:49:06 UTC
do 'emerge sync' and it will be fine.
and please search for bugs like what you want to submit in future (there are at least 3 bugs for this item closed already).
Comment 2 Alistair 2004-03-06 18:26:53 UTC
Greets folks .. this problem appears with emerge qmail and net-mail/qmail-1.03-r15 (this date -- march 6th 2004) (Note emerge sync WAS done)


my workaround was to use src-uri in the ebuild to go get the patch.
the patch @ src uri matches the MD5 in the ebuild kit for r15, but there is
at least 1+ mirror out of sync with this file. 
 
my mirrors:

GENTOO_MIRRORS="ftp://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/mirrors/gentoo http://128.213.5.34/gentoo/ http://cudlug.cudenver.edu/gentoo/ http://gentoo.netnitco.net http://mirror.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/mirror/gentoo.org"


I believe I recieved the b0rked file from uni-erlangen, but I am NOT 100% certain.