Bug 390341 – Correct procmail rule on dev-email.xml

• Status: RESOLVED INVALID
• Product: Documentation

[Description Aaron W. Swenson 2011-11-13 02:15:28 UTC]

Code listing 2.6 [1] provides 'X-Spam-Status: Yes' as the string to match when it should be 'X-Spam-Flag: Yes'.

[1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/infrastructure/dev-email.xml

[Comment 1 Torsten Veller (RETIRED) 2011-11-13 07:47:36 UTC]

The "Developer Handbook" component is for issues in http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml.
The dev-email.xml document is a project-specific document.


The headers contain (mind the capitalisation, if it matters):

X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Status: Yes,...

[Comment 2 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) 2011-11-13 13:33:14 UTC]

$ grep X-Spam 1321190456.29344_1.woodpecker
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Score: 23.56
X-Spam-Level: ***********************
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=23.56 required=5.5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5,

^^ How is 'X-Spam-Status: Yes' wrong? I see no bug here. 'X-Spam-Flag: Yes' is another flag to match, correct.

[Comment 3 Aaron W. Swenson 2011-11-13 13:51:05 UTC]

(In reply to comment #2)
> $ grep X-Spam 1321190456.29344_1.woodpecker
> X-Spam-Flag: YES
> X-Spam-Score: 23.56
> X-Spam-Level: ***********************
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=23.56 required=5.5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5,
> 
> ^^ How is 'X-Spam-Status: Yes' wrong? I see no bug here. 'X-Spam-Flag: Yes' is
> another flag to match, correct.

So it does. My bad.