Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 390197 - Please add cherrypy-tools too gentoo-x86
Summary: Please add cherrypy-tools too gentoo-x86
Status: RESOLVED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Library (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Python Gentoo Team
URL: http://tools.cherrypy.org/browser
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-11-11 16:21 UTC by Christian Ruppert (idl0r)
Modified: 2015-06-13 07:37 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Christian Ruppert (idl0r) gentoo-dev 2011-11-11 16:21:04 UTC 
Some stuff has been deprecated in cherrypy-3.1 and moved into the tools repository in 3.2 and above.

It would be good to add the tools to the tree as well and probably even add a dependency to it for cherrypy itself.

See e.g. https://bitbucket.org/cherrypy/cherrypy/wiki/UpgradeTo32
Comment 1 Ian Delaney (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2015-06-08 01:54:50 UTC 
do you still want this?
Comment 2 Robin Johnson archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2015-06-08 17:53:02 UTC 
Yes, for infra stuff please :-)
Comment 3 Ian Delaney (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2015-06-11 05:33:40 UTC 
The link of $URL does not provide the package source. I spent circa a half hour trying to find it and still never found it. Provide the tarball or a live repo and I can make an ebuild. I was linked to source repos of alternate name so I don't know what or where it is.
Comment 4 Robin Johnson archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2015-06-12 00:56:33 UTC 
I can't find that repo anymore either :-(.

tidy, nsgmls are the tools that were supposed to be moved; but I don't have a clone of the old SVN either.

I think ok to close as RESO/UPSTREAM for now, and it's time to start considering packages.g.o as obsolete, needing replacement (per the IRC discussion I had yesterday in #gentoo-dev).