Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 387937 - sys-devel/binutils: sync Manifest
Summary: sys-devel/binutils: sync Manifest
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo/Alt
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Prefix Support (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Solaris
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Prefix
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 388803
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2011-10-20 21:32 UTC by Florian Ermisch
Modified: 2011-10-28 17:12 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Florian Ermisch 2011-10-20 21:32:18 UTC
The recorded cksums in the prefix-tree for following files differ from those in the mainline-tree: 
(on a Solaris 10 server with prefix in my $HOME)
-bash-3.2$ md5sum /tmp/rmsh-gentoo/distfiles/binutils-2.* | grep checksum
ccd264a5fa9ed992a21427c69cba91d3  /tmp/rmsh-gentoo/distfiles/binutils-2.18.tar.bz2._checksum_failure_.v80LlM
023222f392e9546bcbb0b4c0960729be  /tmp/rmsh-gentoo/distfiles/binutils-2.19.1.tar.bz2._checksum_failure_.drNeSz
2b9dc8f2b7dbd5ec5992c6e29de0b764  /tmp/rmsh-gentoo/distfiles/binutils-2.20.1.tar.bz2._checksum_failure_.B0Q0k8

and on a server running Gentoo/Linux:
~ # md5sum /usr/portage/distfiles/binutils-2.*
3f8ce2a3b8096bdba641b987455f4bb0  /usr/portage/distfiles/binutils-2.18-patches-1.9.tar.bz2
ccd264a5fa9ed992a21427c69cba91d3  /usr/portage/distfiles/binutils-2.18.tar.bz2
09a1bdbfff377e816c844c41b1dd4aa0  /usr/portage/distfiles/binutils-2.20.1-patches-1.1.tar.bz2
2b9dc8f2b7dbd5ec5992c6e29de0b764  /usr/portage/distfiles/binutils-2.20.1.tar.bz2
7babbede162cec5c1f5dd57a046cc336  /usr/portage/distfiles/binutils-2.21.1-patches-1.3.tar.bz2
bde820eac53fa3a8d8696667418557ad  /usr/portage/distfiles/binutils-2.21.1.tar.bz2

as you can the renamed files on the Solaris-server have the same checksums as the distfiles on the Linux-server. The patch-tarballs are not affected.
Comment 1 Fabian Groffen gentoo-dev 2011-10-21 18:03:03 UTC
I took the Manifest from gx86 as input, indeed caused some redownloads, so should be fixed now