Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 386951 - Keyword sys-cluster/cman for new sys-cluster/pacemaker ebuild
Summary: Keyword sys-cluster/cman for new sys-cluster/pacemaker ebuild
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: HPPA Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: Gentoo Cluster Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: KEYWORDREQ
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-10-12 17:28 UTC by Ultrabug
Modified: 2011-10-18 20:55 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ultrabug gentoo-dev 2011-10-12 17:28:12 UTC 
Hi,

Please mask the cman USE flag so I can bump sys-cluster/pacemaker[cman]

Target profiles/default/linux/hppa/package.use.mask :
sys-cluster/pacemaker cman

After this I'll open a KEYWORDREQ for the sys-cluster/cman suite so you can decide later whether to drop this current USE mask or not.

Cheers
Comment 1 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-10-18 18:05:53 UTC 
Instead of simply dropping HPPA from KEYWORDS in the single afflicted ebuild? Aren't you going a bit of a long way about it?
Comment 2 Kacper Kowalik (Xarthisius) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-10-18 18:58:55 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Instead of simply dropping HPPA from KEYWORDS in the single afflicted ebuild?
> Aren't you going a bit of a long way about it?

We actually have hppa users (to my knowledge more than on x86) of this software and we want to make them happy :)
Comment 3 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-10-18 19:50:53 UTC 
As long as the other ebuilds remain available for HPPA, what would be the problem, exactly? So no, I'll test cman and if in the mean time you want to commit the new pacemaker ebuild, then just drop the HPPA keyword in the newer ebuild, and then it's up to our knowledgeable HPPA users to either stick to the older ebuild until the newer one is keyworded, or add both packages to p.keywords locally for the time being. I can't see how you think adding fluff to (p.)u.mask is going to better serve users.
Comment 4 Kacper Kowalik (Xarthisius) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-10-18 20:07:31 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> As long as the other ebuilds remain available for HPPA, what would be the
> problem, exactly? So no, I'll test cman and if in the mean time you want to
> commit the new pacemaker ebuild, then just drop the HPPA keyword in the newer
> ebuild, and then it's up to our knowledgeable HPPA users to either stick to the
> older ebuild until the newer one is keyworded, or add both packages to
> p.keywords locally for the time being. I can't see how you think adding fluff
> to (p.)u.mask is going to better serve users.
Ah I didn't understand you earlier. Yes of course, we'll commit pacemaker with hppa keywords dropped, AFAIR it's scenario that's even covered by ebuild-quiz ;)

This bug should have been KEYWORDREQ from the start, not use.mask request.
I was supposed to change it though it slipped my mind. Mea culpa...

Treat all references to pacemaker as friendly "heads-up". Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Comment 5 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-10-18 20:29:45 UTC 
OK.

Note: There's another corosync/heartbeat problem lurking in cman, similar to bug #387581.
Comment 6 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-10-18 20:55:20 UTC 
Marked ~hppa.