Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 3868 - forte JDK_HOME conflict
Summary: forte JDK_HOME conflict
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Karl Trygve Kalleberg (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-06-18 19:27 UTC by Jacob Perkins
Modified: 2003-02-04 19:42 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jacob Perkins 2002-06-18 19:27:00 UTC
This is in regards to the forte-3.0.ebuild.  It probably shouldn't add a new
JDK_HOME to the environment since it depends on java and gentoo's java setup
will take care of that.  Also, forte installs to /opt, but the JDK_HOME in
21forte in env.d sets JDK_HOME to /usr/local.
Comment 1 Karl Trygve Kalleberg (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-06-18 21:57:31 UTC
Fixed in -r1
Comment 2 Don Seiler (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-06-18 22:52:22 UTC
(ebuild creator here)  It doesn't add a new JDK_HOME.  The JDKs set the
JAVA_HOME variable.  Forte depends (for whatever reason) on a JDK_HOME variable.
 If anything I guess there should be a way to set JDK_HOME equal to the current
JAVA_HOME variable.  I tried to do this initially but it ended up being set to
the string "JAVA_HOME".  But not setting the JDK_HOME at all will cause a
problem, unless my setup was screwed to begin with.
Comment 3 Don Seiler (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-06-18 22:54:19 UTC
1. Open mouth
2. Insert foot

Going over the JDK files I see they do set JDK_HOME.  My apologies.  I agree
with action taken.
Comment 4 Jacob Perkins 2002-06-18 23:04:06 UTC
Since /etc/env.d/21forte is now empty, couldn't it just be removed?