Bug 385559 – dev-cpp/libmcpp-2.7.2-r1 : port to Gentoo Prefix

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo/Alt

[Description Kalon Mills 2011-10-03 22:17:27 UTC]

Created attachment 288727 [details]
libmcpp-2.7.2-r1.ebuild.patch

The ebuild for dev-cpp/libmcpp-2.7.2-r1 contains a few ${D} that didn't exist in previous ebuilds.  Using ecopy correctly fixes these.  Attached is the diff of the ecopy'ed ebuild.

[Comment 1 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) 2011-10-03 22:26:56 UTC]

Since this package hasn't been ported to prefix at all, please clarify: Is this a diff from the original version in the tree? If not, could you please add that?

[Comment 2 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) 2011-10-03 22:28:24 UTC]

*** Bug 385563 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 3 Kalon Mills 2011-10-03 22:40:12 UTC]

Ok, my bad.  I was under the impression that if the ebuild existed in the the gentoo_prefix portage tree then it had been previously ported. 

The attached diff was generated between ${EPREFIX}/usr/portage/dev-cpp/libmcpp/libmcpp-2.7.2-r1.ebuild and the ecopy'ed ebuild.  I just downloaded the ebuild from the main portage tree and diffed against it.  It produced the same diff as the attached.

[Comment 4 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) 2011-10-03 23:25:27 UTC]

(In reply to comment #3)
> Ok, my bad.  I was under the impression that if the ebuild existed in the the
> gentoo_prefix portage tree then it had been previously ported. 

Nope, only KEYWORDS mean that it has been ported/tested.

> 
> The attached diff was generated between
> ${EPREFIX}/usr/portage/dev-cpp/libmcpp/libmcpp-2.7.2-r1.ebuild and the ecopy'ed
> ebuild.  I just downloaded the ebuild from the main portage tree and diffed
> against it.  It produced the same diff as the attached.

Ok, looks fine. Thanks

[Comment 5 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) 2011-10-07 19:13:37 UTC]

+  07 Oct 2011; Jeremy Olexa <[e-mail]> libmcpp-2.7.2-r1.ebuild:
+  Add Gentoo Prefix support, by Kalon Mills in bug 385559