Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 381839 - app-emulation/qemu-0.14.0 says "powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc: Internal error: Killed (program cc1)" @ sparc64-softmmu/translate.o
Summary: app-emulation/qemu-0.14.0 says "powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc: Internal error...
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Luca Barbato
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-09-05 00:29 UTC by hiyuh
Modified: 2011-09-06 01:00 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
build.log of app-emulation/qemu-0.14.0 (build.log,37.59 KB, text/plain)
2011-09-05 00:31 UTC, hiyuh
Details
emerge --info (emerge-info.log,4.41 KB, text/plain)
2011-09-05 00:31 UTC, hiyuh
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description hiyuh 2011-09-05 00:29:05 UTC
ssia

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge =app-emulation/qemu-0.14.0 on ~ppc

Actual Results:  
powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc says "Internal error: Killed (program cc1)"

Expected Results:  
no internal error is expected.
Comment 1 hiyuh 2011-09-05 00:31:34 UTC
Created attachment 285557 [details]
build.log of app-emulation/qemu-0.14.0
Comment 2 hiyuh 2011-09-05 00:31:53 UTC
Created attachment 285559 [details]
emerge --info
Comment 3 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-09-05 12:11:44 UTC
You ran out of memory. Please install more RAM, set up swap space, run fewer processes (parallel make), remove -pipe from your C{,XX}FLAGS, and so on.
Comment 4 Doug Goldstein (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-09-05 17:40:55 UTC
Due to a bug in certain GCC versions, compiling translate.c for some targets may require 4GB of RAM for GCC alone.
Comment 5 hiyuh 2011-09-06 01:00:26 UTC
sorry for post after mark RESOLVED INVALID.

is it related this mem hog bug?

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-03/msg01249.html

in this mail, Paolo Bonzini said "this memory-hog behavior is a GCC regression."
would you mind to tell me where bugs which aren't marked RESOLVED INVALID for this issue are, if you know?