This package installs also static libs ".a" please provide do add relative USE. TIA /usr/lib/libgpm.a /usr/lib/libgpm.so
*** Bug 426894 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Oh...fantastic! Sorry about the duplication, I missed this one when I did a search. I wouldn't mind taking a crack at implementing this -- is that OK? Also, can/should I update it to EAPI 4?
(In reply to comment #2) feel free
Created attachment 322060 [details] ebuild for gpm 1.20.6 with shared library as default Attached is my first attempt at an updated ebuild. Comments and suggestions welcome.
Comment on attachment 322060 [details] ebuild for gpm 1.20.6 with shared library as default (In reply to comment #4) we usually want to see diffs, not entire files, as it is very easy to review the former but much harder to review the latter. could you post it in the unidiff format please (`diff -u`) ?
Created attachment 322120 [details, diff] diff of sys-libs/gpm with shared libs as default
Comment on attachment 322120 [details, diff] diff of sys-libs/gpm with shared libs as default yes, this is one way of doing it. but generally we try to avoid over-compiling. instead of that src_install change, you added this to src_prepare: if ! use static-libs ; then sed -i \ -e '/^all:/s:lib/libgpm.a::' \ -e '/INSTALL_DATA.*libgpm.a/d' \ src/Makefile.in || die fi super bonus points if you patched the source to respect --enable-static flags :)
Created attachment 322342 [details, diff] sys-libs/gpm ebuild patch for static-libs USE support
Created attachment 322344 [details, diff] configure patch to not build static libgpm by default
Now that Bugzilla is back, *ping*!
*ping^2*
*ping^3*
I have it open, I have it downloaded, just haven't had the time, coffee and then I'll apply it ;)
For the record, this issue has been reported upstream.
That's great -- it seems to only be a concern for this specific and any prior releases as their Git repository has long since been introduced to libtool. No release was ever made for this change, however.
I have everything in place, _but_ I'm checking now the reverse deps as splashutils will be broken by this change, for instance.
Okay this one is in.