Please stable. Only runtime tests. No bug so far reported
amd64: all ok
amd64 done. Thanks Ian
amd64 stable keyword reverted
Tested on x86, all good here.
Requires sci-chemistry/oasis/oasis-4.0-r2.ebuild: amd64(default/linux/amd64/10.0) ['sci-chemistry/ccp4-apps', 'sci-chemistry/solve-resolve-bin', 'sci-chemist ry/arp-warp-bin'] Please let us know what to do with solve-resolve-bin
(In reply to comment #5) > Requires > > sci-chemistry/oasis/oasis-4.0-r2.ebuild: amd64(default/linux/amd64/10.0) > ['sci-chemistry/ccp4-apps', 'sci-chemistry/solve-resolve-bin', 'sci-chemist > ry/arp-warp-bin'] > > Please let us know what to do with solve-resolve-bin Please stable it on all arches.
Hi Justin, the dependency structure of these sci-bugs is completely messed up and circular. Oasis depends on the stable bugs that it blocks. Can you either please fix it, or make one new huge bug with the whole list. I would also have to use a lot of repoman force to commit all these changes from individual bugs in the wrong order...
I am sorry for that mess. Could you do me a favour and add a list of all packages we need to be stabled for sci.chemistry/ccp4 latest version? I will clean the bugs according to that then. thanks
amd64 ok, you can mark stable at same time the following list: =sci-chemistry/xia2-0.3.3.1 =sci-chemistry/mrbump-0.4.4 =sci-chemistry/oasis-4.0-r2 =sci-chemistry/ccp4-apps-6.1.3-r10 =sci-chemistry/pointless-1.6.2 there are no blocks for me merging this list at same time.
+ 06 Oct 2011; Tony Vroon <chainsaw@gentoo.org> oasis-4.0-r2.ebuild: + Marked stable on AMD64 based on arch testing by Agostino "ago" Sarubbo in bug + #351753.
(In reply to comment #8) > I am sorry for that mess. Could you do me a favour and add a list of all > packages we need to be stabled for sci.chemistry/ccp4 latest version? I will > clean the bugs according to that then. thanks Please do. I noticed Agostino (ago) posted some lists, but it's not ACK-ed by the maintainers and bug deps are still a mess. How about closing existing bugs and opening a new open, having everything needed in it? By the way, this is exactly the reason why those packages are not stable on x86 yet.
(In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #8) > > I am sorry for that mess. Could you do me a favour and add a list of all > > packages we need to be stabled for sci.chemistry/ccp4 latest version? I will > > clean the bugs according to that then. thanks > > Please do. I noticed Agostino (ago) posted some lists, but it's not ACK-ed by > the maintainers and bug deps are still a mess. How about closing existing bugs > and opening a new open, having everything needed in it? > > By the way, this is exactly the reason why those packages are not stable on x86 > yet. I resorted all the bugz. packages to stabilize are sci-chemistry/ccp4-apps sci-chemistry/oasis sci-chemistry/mrbump sci-chemistry/pointless sci-chemistry/xia2 sci-chemistry/ccp4 in this order. Hopefully I didn't miss any.
X86 please go ahead
x86 stabilized with bug 375917. Thanks, closing!