Even if upstream seems to now develop it much more, it's the same with xsane and, as I tested the other day, gnome-scan works far better than xsane for me (xsane crashes a lot and its results look worse :S) I would like to see this stabilized if possible, does the rest of the team agree? Reproducible: Always
same as xsane, amd64 ok
+ 30 Aug 2011; Tony Vroon <chainsaw@gentoo.org> gnome-scan-0.7.2.ebuild: + Marked stable on AMD64 based on arch testing by Agostino "ago" Sarubbo in bug + #375669 filed by Pacho Ramos.
x86 stable, closing