Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 37137 - Update to libglademm-2.0.1.ebuild which adds documentation support.
Summary: Update to libglademm-2.0.1.ebuild which adds documentation support.
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Unspecified (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-01-03 12:57 UTC by Tarmo Tänav
Modified: 2005-05-22 14:43 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Makes libglademm-2.0.1-r1.ebuild from libglademm-2.0.1.ebuild. (libglademm-2.0.1.patch,1.30 KB, patch)
2004-01-03 13:00 UTC, Tarmo Tänav
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tarmo Tänav 2004-01-03 12:57:50 UTC
I added the "doc" USE flag to libglademm and added support for
the doxygen generated documentation. I also had to change the
Doxyfile, because it had some variables which I didn't know how
to use or if they were not supposed to be there at all.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge =libglademm-2.0.1
Actual Results:  
No useful documentation for developers installed.

Expected Results:  
Useful documentation for developers at /usr/share/doc/libglademm-2.0.1/.
Comment 1 Tarmo Tänav 2004-01-03 13:00:27 UTC
Created attachment 23090 [details, diff]
Makes libglademm-2.0.1-r1.ebuild from libglademm-2.0.1.ebuild.
Comment 2 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-08-18 15:21:34 UTC
c'mon khai, these sort of things should've been picked up when handling these packages.
Comment 3 Tarmo Tänav 2005-05-22 14:43:05 UTC
I don't think this bug has any purpose if libglademm-2.4.1 (currently in ~x86)
already installs its API documentation automatically and adding 'doc' use flag
for it would have little meaning because the whole documentation is only around
600k. If anyone disagrees, please reopen this bug.