Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 36936 - Bootstrapping fails at glibc when USE="nptl"
Summary: Bootstrapping fails at glibc when USE="nptl"
Status: RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High minor (vote)
Assignee: Please assign to toolchain
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-01-01 07:55 UTC by Florian Huber
Modified: 2004-06-10 10:19 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Florian Huber 2004-01-01 07:55:35 UTC
Bootstrapping fails at glibc (sys-libs/glibc-2.3.2-r3)
when the nptl use-flag is set, because there are no 2.(5|6) kernel headers at this point.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. USE="nptl"
2. /usr/portage/scripts/bootstrap.sh
3.

Actual Results:  
Bootstrapping aborted

Expected Results:  
Boostrapping :)

"Fix": emerge /usr/portage/sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.6.ebuild
and restart the bootstrapping process.
Comment 1 Martin Schlemmer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-01-01 12:46:04 UTC
Known issue.  Until we get policy on how to handle 2.6 kernel/headers (as we
cannot unmask 2.6 until it is mainline for distro), it will not be fixed
by itself.

I added a scripts/bootstrap-2.6.sh for now that should warn about this.  If
the guys building stages can test it, we may move it to replace bootstap.sh.
Comment 2 Martin Schlemmer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-01-01 14:07:42 UTC
Donnie, I am not sure if you are going to handle this, but could we please
get it like the newer versions are supposed to be?  Meaning, the patch is
called say 'foo-20040101.diff' (date when minion.de released it), and not
'foo.diff'.  This makes things easy to see what patch we are using, or if
we need to backtrack on the patch (no issues that the patch might not be
synced in rsync due to the name being the same as older version).  Thanks.
Comment 3 Martin Schlemmer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-01-01 14:30:28 UTC
Forget comment #2 - that was for another bug, sorry.
Comment 4 Joshua Kinard gentoo-dev 2004-05-28 18:41:17 UTC
Marking as TEST-REQUEST, so anyone whose tested the 2.6 bootstrap out, log any issues here if something crops up.
Comment 5 Jeremy Huddleston (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-06-10 10:19:41 UTC
I merged in some changes that were made to bootstrap.sh into bootstrap-2.6.sh and additionally fixed the profile headers detection logic to work with virtuals... it wasn't detecting the proper package for me (it was blank).