Bug 368583 – =dev-tcltk/blt-2.4z-r10 Stable request

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Agostino Sarubbo 2011-05-24 13:11:29 UTC]

PLease mark stable dev-tcltk/blt-2.4z-r8. Fixed respect of LDFLAGS in this revision.



Already ok for me on amd64.

[Comment 1 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2011-05-24 13:20:58 UTC]

ago, please check for open bugs before you file stabilisation requests.

[Comment 2 Agostino Sarubbo 2011-05-24 13:30:27 UTC]

(In reply to comment #1)
> ago, please check for open bugs before you file stabilisation requests.

yes, you're right, but i say ok because from my log there isn't issue related on bug 359781 and i have not et_EE locale. Sorry for my absence that not checked for bugs.

[Comment 3 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2011-10-24 11:44:47 UTC]

-r5 has a lot more problems than the ones you mentioned.

[Comment 4 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2011-10-24 11:51:13 UTC]

Looks like we need a fix for bug #359781 first.

[Comment 5 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) 2011-10-24 17:57:57 UTC]

Please go ahead. This rev simply drops the rpath definition.

[Comment 6 Agostino Sarubbo 2011-10-24 21:37:28 UTC]

you should drop static-libs:
/usr/lib64/libBLT24.a                                                                                                                                                               
/usr/lib64/libBLTlite24.a                                                                                                                                                           
/usr/lib64/libBLTlite.a                                                                                                                                                             
/usr/lib64/libBLT.a                                                                                                                                                                 
/usr/lib64/libBLT24.so                                                                                                                                                              
/usr/lib64/libBLTlite24.so                                                                                                                                                          
/usr/lib64/libBLTlite.so                                                                                                                                                            
/usr/lib64/libBLT.so 

fix on the fly or new bug?

[Comment 7 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2011-10-25 03:34:20 UTC]

(In reply to comment #6)
> you should drop static-libs:
> /usr/lib64/libBLT24.a                                                           
> /usr/lib64/libBLTlite24.a                                                       
> /usr/lib64/libBLTlite.a                                                         
> /usr/lib64/libBLT.a                                                             
> /usr/lib64/libBLT24.so                                                          
> /usr/lib64/libBLTlite24.so                                                      
> /usr/lib64/libBLTlite.so                                                        
> /usr/lib64/libBLT.so 
> 
> fix on the fly or new bug?

Right when we're stabilising this for a dev-lang/python stabilisation? I'd settle for this right now...

[Comment 8 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2011-10-25 03:37:46 UTC]

(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > you should drop static-libs:
> > fix on the fly or new bug?
> 
> Right when we're stabilising this for a dev-lang/python stabilisation? I'd
> settle for this right now...

To further explain, we'd first need to figure out what rdeps fail and need to have their dep USE flags adjusted.

[Comment 9 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) 2011-10-25 06:01:06 UTC]

+  25 Oct 2011; Justin Lecher <[e-mail]> blt-2.4z-r10.ebuild:
+  Added USE=static-libs requested by ago
+

[Comment 10 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2011-10-26 14:35:35 UTC]

Stable for HPPA.

[Comment 11 Agostino Sarubbo 2011-10-26 18:06:44 UTC]

perfect now, amd64 ok

[Comment 12 Ian Delaney (RETIRED) 2011-10-27 21:39:00 UTC]

ditto Ago

[Comment 13 Tony Vroon (RETIRED) 2011-11-01 14:11:25 UTC]

+  01 Nov 2011; Tony Vroon <[e-mail]> blt-2.4z-r10.ebuild:
+  Marked stable on AMD64 based on arch testing by Agostino "ago" Sarubbo & Ian
+  "idella4" Delaney in bug #368583.

[Comment 14 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) 2011-11-02 14:56:37 UTC]

x86 stable

[Comment 15 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2011-11-05 19:14:30 UTC]

alpha/arm/ia64/s390/sh/sparc stable(it already was...)

[Comment 16 Alan Hourihane 2011-11-07 12:04:43 UTC]

When I try to emerge I get this......

>>> Downloading 'http://jos.decoster.googlepages.com/blt2.4z-8.5.2.tar.gz'
--2011-11-07 12:01:15--  http://jos.decoster.googlepages.com/blt2.4z-8.5.2.tar.gz
Resolving jos.decoster.googlepages.com... 74.125.230.101, 74.125.230.96, 74.125.230.99, ...
Connecting to jos.decoster.googlepages.com|74.125.230.101|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved Permanently
Location: http://sites.google.com/site/josdecoster/blt2.4z-8.5.2.tar.gz [following]
--2011-11-07 12:01:15--  http://sites.google.com/site/josdecoster/blt2.4z-8.5.2.tar.gz
Resolving sites.google.com... 209.85.143.100, 209.85.143.101
Connecting to sites.google.com|209.85.143.100|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
2011-11-07 12:01:16 ERROR 404: Not Found.

!!! Couldn't download 'blt2.4z-8.5.2.tar.gz'. Aborting.
 * Fetch failed for 'dev-tcltk/blt-2.4z-r10', Log file:
 *  '/var/tmp/portage/dev-tcltk/blt-2.4z-r10/temp/build.log'

[Comment 17 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) 2011-11-10 19:21:14 UTC]

(In reply to comment #16)
> When I try to emerge I get this......
> 
> >>> Downloading 'http://jos.decoster.googlepages.com/blt2.4z-8.5.2.tar.gz'
> --2011-11-07 12:01:15-- 
> http://jos.decoster.googlepages.com/blt2.4z-8.5.2.tar.gz
> Resolving jos.decoster.googlepages.com... 74.125.230.101, 74.125.230.96,
> 74.125.230.99, ...
> Connecting to jos.decoster.googlepages.com|74.125.230.101|:80... connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved Permanently
> Location: http://sites.google.com/site/josdecoster/blt2.4z-8.5.2.tar.gz
> [following]
> --2011-11-07 12:01:15-- 
> http://sites.google.com/site/josdecoster/blt2.4z-8.5.2.tar.gz
> Resolving sites.google.com... 209.85.143.100, 209.85.143.101
> Connecting to sites.google.com|209.85.143.100|:80... connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
> 2011-11-07 12:01:16 ERROR 404: Not Found.
> 
> !!! Couldn't download 'blt2.4z-8.5.2.tar.gz'. Aborting.
>  * Fetch failed for 'dev-tcltk/blt-2.4z-r10', Log file:
>  *  '/var/tmp/portage/dev-tcltk/blt-2.4z-r10/temp/build.log'

Please use our mirrors. They have the sources you need.

http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/mirrors2.xml

[Comment 18 Kacper Kowalik (Xarthisius) (RETIRED) 2011-11-20 09:52:04 UTC]

+  20 Nov 2011; Kacper Kowalik <[e-mail]> -blt-2.4z-r5.ebuild,
+  -blt-2.4z-r8.ebuild, -blt-2.4z-r9.ebuild, blt-2.4z-r10.ebuild:
+  ppc/ppc64 stable wrt #368583, drop old