Bug 365999 – sys-libs/glibc-2.13 building for s390x fails with <=sys-devel/binutils-2.21

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Alon Bar-Lev 2011-05-04 18:37:29 UTC]

Created attachment 272115 [details]
crossdev -t s390x-ibm-linux-gnu

s390 works.
s390x not.

Attached relevant stuff.
Thanks!

[Comment 1 Alon Bar-Lev 2011-05-04 18:40:51 UTC]

r2/work/build-default-s390x-ibm-linux-gnu-nptl/iconvdata/utf8-utf32-z9.os
../iconv/loop.c: Assembler messages:
../iconv/loop.c:332: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `cu42'
../iconv/loop.c:433: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `cu42'
../iconv/loop.c:332: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `cu42'
make[2]: *** [/var/tmp/portage/cross-s390x-ibm-linux-gnu/glibc-2.13-r2/work/build-default-s390x-ibm-linux-gnu-nptl/iconvdata/utf16-utf32-z9.os] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
../iconv/loop.c: Assembler messages:
../iconv/loop.c:332: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `cu12'
../iconv/loop.c:332: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `cu12'
../iconv/loop.c:433: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `cu12'
make[2]: *** [/var/tmp/portage/cross-s390x-ibm-linux-gnu/glibc-2.13-r2/work/build-default-s390x-ibm-linux-gnu-nptl/iconvdata/utf8-utf16-z9.os] Error 1
../iconv/loop.c: Assembler messages:
../iconv/loop.c:332: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `cu41'
../iconv/loop.c:332: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `cu14'
../iconv/loop.c:433: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `cu41'
../iconv/loop.c:433: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `cu14'
../iconv/loop.c:332: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `cu41'
../iconv/loop.c:332: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `cu14'

[Comment 2 Alon Bar-Lev 2011-05-04 18:45:14 UTC]

Created attachment 272117 [details]
cross-s390x-ibm-linux-gnu-glibc.log.gz

Also happens with USE="-nls"

[Comment 3 SpanKY 2011-05-28 19:53:32 UTC]

glibc is using opcodes that arent supported in latest binutils release (2.21)

further, gcc invokes as with -mzarch -march=z900 which causes gas to flag those as invalid for the requested target ...

[Comment 4 Alon Bar-Lev 2011-11-23 11:25:11 UTC]

As you promised, working with latest binutils!

[Comment 5 SpanKY 2012-02-15 03:54:53 UTC]

*** Bug 403713 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 6 SpanKY 2012-02-15 03:55:38 UTC]

Armin posted a patch to upstream which includes a patch to make it build with older binutils ...

[Comment 7 SpanKY 2012-02-16 02:57:09 UTC]

added the patch to the tree.  no revbump since this is a build fix.  lemme know how it goes ;).

http://sources.gentoo.org/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.11.3.ebuild?r1=1.11&r2=1.12
http://sources.gentoo.org/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.12.2.ebuild?r1=1.14&r2=1.15
http://sources.gentoo.org/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.13-r4.ebuild?r1=1.12&r2=1.13
http://sources.gentoo.org/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.14.1-r2.ebuild?r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://sources.gentoo.org/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.15.ebuild?r1=1.6&r2=1.7

[Comment 8 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2012-02-16 19:54:04 UTC]

(In reply to comment #7)
> added the patch to the tree.  no revbump since this is a build fix.  lemme know
> how it goes ;).
> 
> http://sources.gentoo.org/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.11.3.ebuild?r1=1.11&r2=1.12
> http://sources.gentoo.org/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.12.2.ebuild?r1=1.14&r2=1.15
> http://sources.gentoo.org/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.13-r4.ebuild?r1=1.12&r2=1.13
> http://sources.gentoo.org/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.14.1-r2.ebuild?r1=1.3&r2=1.4
> http://sources.gentoo.org/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.15.ebuild?r1=1.6&r2=1.7

It works, thanks

[Comment 9 SpanKY 2012-08-17 16:19:40 UTC]

they ended up fixing it in a different way:
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2011-04/msg00021.html

(this fix is still fine though)