https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651183 seems to indicate there are still problems with fuse-2.8.5, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651183#c40
CVE-2010-3879 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3879): FUSE, possibly 2.8.5 and earlier, allows local users to create mtab entries with arbitrary pathnames, and consequently unmount any filesystem, via a symlink attack on the parent directory of the mountpoint of a FUSE filesystem, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0789.
CVE-2011-0543 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-0543): Certain legacy functionality in fusermount in fuse 2.8.5 and earlier, when util-linux does not support the --no-canonicalize option, allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions and unmount arbitrary directories via a symlink attack. CVE-2011-0542 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-0542): fusermount in fuse 2.8.5 and earlier does not perform a chdir to / before performing a mount or umount, which allows local users to unmount arbitrary directories via unspecified vectors. CVE-2011-0541 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-0541): fuse 2.8.5 and earlier does not properly handle when /etc/mtab cannot be updated, which allows local users to unmount arbitrary directories via a symlink attack.
No affected versions in tree. Recent enough for a GLSA vote, I guess. GLSA vote: no.
NO too, closing.