Bug 357599 – Please (re-)keyword perl-core/Module-Build, perl-core/CPAN-Meta, perl-core/Version-Requirements, perl-core/Module-Metadata, perl-core/Perl-OSType

• Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Torsten Veller (RETIRED) 2011-03-06 08:18:14 UTC]

Module-Build-0.380.0 is currently masked for testing.
I will drop the keywords when i unmask it and the deps are not keyworded.

Please (re-)keyword

# @mips
# @bsd
perl-core/Module-Metadata
virtual/perl-Module-Metadata
perl-core/Perl-OSType
virtual/perl-Perl-OSType

# @all
perl-core/Version-Requirements
virtual/perl-Version-Requirements
perl-core/CPAN-Meta
virtual/perl-CPAN-Meta

>=perl-core/Module-Build-0.380.0
>=virtual/perl-Module-Build-0.380.0

Thanks


 KEYWORDS.dropped
   virtual/perl-Module-Build/perl-Module-Build-0.380.0.ebuild:
alpha amd64-linux arm hppa ia64 ia64-linux m68k m68k-mint mips ppc ppc-aix ppc-macos ppc64 s390 sh sparc sparc-fbsd sparc-solaris sparc64-solaris x64-macos x64-solaris x86-fbsd x86-freebsd x86-interix x86-linux x86-macos x86-solaris

[Comment 1 Torsten Veller (RETIRED) 2011-03-06 08:19:19 UTC]

*** Bug 353115 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 2 Fabian Groffen 2011-03-06 10:03:14 UTC]

prefix done

[Comment 3 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2011-03-08 14:41:00 UTC]

Marked ~hppa.

[Comment 4 Markus Meier 2011-03-13 21:51:26 UTC]

~arm should be done

[Comment 5 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2011-03-20 10:43:41 UTC]

~alpha/~ia64/~s390/~sh/~sparc done

[Comment 6 Matt Turner 2011-06-13 00:54:19 UTC]

Added ~mips.

[Comment 7 Alexis Ballier 2011-07-07 04:44:06 UTC]

x86-fbsd done
feel free to drop sparc-fbsd as i dont see the situation improving in the near future and there's no perl available anyway

[Comment 8 Torsten Veller (RETIRED) 2011-07-09 17:45:13 UTC]

@ppc: Please rekeyword 

>=perl-core/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-0.6.580.0
>=virtual/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-0.6.580.0

[Comment 9 Kacper Kowalik (Xarthisius) (RETIRED) 2011-07-26 18:04:53 UTC]

Could you help me to create explicit list of thing to stabilize? When I try to do things you've listed (as-is) I get weird results:

[ebuild  N     ] perl-core/version-0.910.0 
[ebuild  N    *] perl-core/JSON-PP-2.272.0 
[ebuild  N     ] perl-core/CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.3.0 
[ebuild  N     ] perl-core/Test-Simple-0.980.0 
[ebuild  N     ] virtual/perl-File-Temp-0.220.0-r1 
[ebuild  N     ] virtual/perl-version-0.910.0 
[ebuild     U #] dev-lang/perl-5.14.1 [5.12.3-r1]
[ebuild  N     ] virtual/perl-Test-Simple-0.980.0-r1 
[ebuild     UD#] dev-lang/perl-5.10.1 [5.12.3-r1]
[ebuild  N    *] virtual/perl-JSON-PP-2.272.0 
[ebuild  N     ] virtual/perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.3.0-r1 
[ebuild  N    *] virtual/perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta-1.440.100-r2 
[ebuild  N    *] perl-core/Version-Requirements-0.101.20 
[ebuild  N    *] virtual/perl-IO-1.25 
[ebuild  N     ] perl-core/Perl-OSType-1.2.0  USE="test" 
[ebuild  N     ] perl-core/Module-Metadata-1.0.4 
[ebuild  N    *] virtual/perl-ExtUtils-Manifest-1.580.0-r1 
[ebuild  N    *] virtual/perl-ExtUtils-Install-1.54 
[ebuild  N    *] virtual/perl-ExtUtils-Command-1.170.0-r2 
[ebuild  N    *] virtual/perl-Version-Requirements-0.101.20-r2 
[ebuild  N     ] virtual/perl-Perl-OSType-1.2.0 
[ebuild  N     ] virtual/perl-Module-Metadata-1.0.4-r2 
[ebuild  N    *] perl-core/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.580.0 
[ebuild  N    *] virtual/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.580.0 
[ebuild  N    *] perl-core/CPAN-Meta-2.110.930 
[ebuild  N    *] virtual/perl-CPAN-Meta-2.110.930 
[ebuild     U *] perl-core/Module-Build-0.380.0 [0.36.07]
[ebuild     U *] virtual/perl-Module-Build-0.380.0-r2 [0.36.07]

Especially installing perl-5.10 ad perl-5.14 at the same time doesn't bode well...

[Comment 10 Kacper Kowalik (Xarthisius) (RETIRED) 2011-07-26 18:35:47 UTC]

I've figured it out. ~ppc/~ppc64 done

[Comment 11 Torsten Veller (RETIRED) 2013-01-07 04:23:21 UTC]

m68k was added to Module-Build. But the dependencies were not fixed.
Do you want me to add m68k to make repoman happy?

http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/perl-core/Module-Build/ChangeLog?rev=1.65&view=markup

[Comment 12 SpanKY 2013-01-07 17:25:45 UTC]

(In reply to comment #11)

should be set now.  if not, feel free to add.

[Comment 13 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) 2014-04-20 05:51:13 UTC]

m68k goes `exp` profile now, not a `dev`, so, it may be broken a little.