Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 35555 - dev-perl modules that no longer have valid src_uri's (too old)
Summary: dev-perl modules that no longer have valid src_uri's (too old)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Library (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Perl team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 35550 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-12-10 14:27 UTC by Brian Harring (RETIRED)
Modified: 2003-12-11 01:20 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
list of x86 dev-perl/* modules that have no valid src_uri (dev-perl-unmasked.log,770 bytes, text/plain)
2003-12-10 16:38 UTC, Brian Harring (RETIRED)
Details
list of ~x86 dev-perl/* modules that have no valid src_uri (dev-perl-masked.log,723 bytes, text/plain)
2003-12-10 16:41 UTC, Brian Harring (RETIRED)
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Brian Harring (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-12-10 14:27:36 UTC
Same thing as http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13049 ; Using this bug as a catch all for the packages that are currently broke.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
emerge any of the packages listed below.


Expected Results:  
Should pull down the src.

All packages listed below *will not* emerge, regardless if it's tried as masked or unmasked.  The 
src is no longer on CPAN.  Version bumping ought to fix it.

dev-perl/AtExit
dev-perl/BSD-Resource
dev-perl/Class-MakeMethods-Template
dev-perl/Crypt-SmbHash
dev-perl/CursesWidgets
dev-perl/DelimMatch
dev-perl/Devel-StackTrace
dev-perl/Digest-MD4
dev-perl/Digest-MD5
dev-perl/Digest-SHA1
dev-perl/ExtUtils-AutoInstall
dev-perl/ExtUtils-MakeMaker
dev-perl/Festival-Client-Async
dev-perl/File-Find-Rule
dev-perl/FileHandle-Deluxe
dev-perl/FileHandle-Rollback
dev-perl/FileHandle-Unget
dev-perl/GDGraph
dev-perl/GDTextUtil
dev-perl/Geo-IP
dev-perl/Getopt-Long
dev-perl/IO-String
dev-perl/ImageInfo
dev-perl/MD5
dev-perl/Mail-Procmail
dev-perl/Mail-SpamAssassin
dev-perl/MailTools
dev-perl/Math-BigInt
dev-perl/POP3Client
dev-perl/Params-Validate
dev-perl/Proc-Daemon
dev-perl/Proc-Simple
dev-perl/SNMP_Session
dev-perl/Test-Manifest
dev-perl/Text-Glob
dev-perl/Time-HiRes
dev-perl/URI
dev-perl/XML-GDOME
dev-perl/XML-LibXML-XPathContext
dev-perl/XML-RSS
dev-perl/adocman
dev-perl/cdk-perl
dev-perl/class-returnvalue
dev-perl/config-general
dev-perl/dbix-searchbuilder
dev-perl/digest-md2
dev-perl/extutils-depends
dev-perl/glib-perl
dev-perl/gnome2-canvas
dev-perl/gnome2-perl
dev-perl/gnome2-print
dev-perl/gtk2-gladexml
dev-perl/gtk2-perl
dev-perl/gtk2-spell
dev-perl/i18n-langtags
dev-perl/locale-maketext-fuzzy
dev-perl/locale-maketext-lexicon
dev-perl/log-dispatch
dev-perl/mod_perl
dev-perl/net-ping
dev-perl/perlrapi
dev-perl/regexp-common
dev-perl/sdl-perl
dev-perl/text-template
Comment 1 Brian Harring (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-12-10 14:30:18 UTC
*** Bug 35550 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Brian Harring (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-12-10 14:54:53 UTC
hmm. pardon, borked that slightly- the above list is of *unmasked* packages that no longer have a valid SRC_URI.

I'll attach a list of *masked* packages that aren't valid shortly.
Comment 3 Brian Harring (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-12-10 16:38:59 UTC
Created attachment 22006 [details]
list of x86 dev-perl/* modules that have no valid src_uri

Ignore the original post; this attachment is the specific x86 dev-perl packages
that currently have no src_uri.
Comment 4 Brian Harring (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-12-10 16:41:59 UTC
Created attachment 22007 [details]
list of ~x86 dev-perl/* modules that have no valid src_uri

The correct list of *just* ~x86 packages that no longer have a valid src_uri.  

Note there packages that are both in x86 and ~x86.

If this list seems funky, email me- I used a script which took a few revisions
to get it behaving correctly.
The initial post w/ package lists should be ignored, it's incorrect.  The
attachments are the correct lists.  Sorry about that guys...
Comment 5 Brian Harring (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-12-11 01:20:40 UTC
Hmm.  I must be losing my mind, scanned it again. and everything is valid.

Closing the bug, since the issue no longer exists.
If somebody fixed this in someway, please drop me an email- I'd like to know what the heck that was.