Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 349897 - ADD LIBTOOLFLAGS to emerge --info
Summary: ADD LIBTOOLFLAGS to emerge --info
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Core system (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Portage team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-12-27 20:48 UTC by Jory A. Pratt
Modified: 2011-01-28 21:59 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jory A. Pratt gentoo-dev 2010-12-27 20:48:41 UTC
Add support for libtoolflags to be defined via make.conf without adding them to makeopts.
Comment 1 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2010-12-27 21:13:58 UTC
There's nothing that really prevents you from using LIBTOOLFLAGS in make.conf, is there? Isn't it just that you want the user interface (like emerge --info) to display it as it does for similar variables like LDFLAGS? The patch that you posted in #gentoo-dev had it added to the list of variables to be exported in ebuild.sh. I guess that would be fine, but generally this is not necessary since all variables from make.conf or package.env are automatically exported anyway (since they are passed from the parent process in the exec call).
Comment 2 Jory A. Pratt gentoo-dev 2010-12-27 21:33:04 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> There's nothing that really prevents you from using LIBTOOLFLAGS in make.conf,
> is there? Isn't it just that you want the user interface (like emerge --info)
> to display it as it does for similar variables like LDFLAGS? The patch that you
> posted in #gentoo-dev had it added to the list of variables to be exported in
> ebuild.sh. I guess that would be fine, but generally this is not necessary
> since all variables from make.conf or package.env are automatically exported
> anyway (since they are passed from the parent process in the exec call).
> 

Err this is correct, been a long day thanks for clarifying for everyone
Comment 3 Sebastian Luther (few) 2011-01-28 21:59:29 UTC
No bug here.