Basically we need a way to make sure that we respect limits for an arbitrary user, such as apache2, without dropping privs from root.
what are you talking about exactly ? s-s-d ? please provide some real details.
(In reply to comment #1) > what are you talking about exactly ? s-s-d ? please provide some real > details. I spoke with Diego on irc about this, and yes, he is talking about s-s-d. We need a way for s-s-d to respect the limits of a user but not drop privs. Theis is his blog post on the issue. [1] [1] http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2010/10/02/service-limits
i'm not going to dig through an external site to figure out what a reporter is trying to say. simply summarize the details in the bug just like we've always required of posters.
I see that the code in start-stop-daemon has changed since this bug was open. Particularly we don't refer to the user "nobody" any longer. Is this bug still an issue?