Considering latest stable gucharmap (2.30.2) broken emerge (Bug#:346003), I suggest to mask the gucharmap use flag of bluefish as long as this bug is not fixed as part of a new stable version of gucharmap. Reproducible: Always
I suggest you get your system fixed before filing such bugs. gucharmap-2.30.2 builds just fine here. Of course, figuring out what's broken might take a while - those docs errors are sometimes tricky.
(In reply to comment #1) > Of course, figuring out what's broken might take a while > - those docs errors are sometimes tricky. Particularily when it comes to DTD's versions... You are right. Sorry for disturbing. Changing status to invalid.
(In reply to comment #1) > I suggest you get your system fixed before filing such bugs. > gucharmap-2.30.2 builds just fine here. Thanks god, we get devs slightly more respectful towards bug reports and not sharing the same collection of a-priori regarding bug-reporter's system... http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346031 BTW I reopen this enhancement request, leaving to you the "honour" to close it WONTFIX or the pleasure to either mask gucharmap use flag until 2.32.1 gets stable or, as bug 346031 suggests : RDEPEND gucharmap? ( >= gnome-extra/gucharmap-2.32.1[doc] )
(In reply to comment #3) > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346031 I meant http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346003. Of course...
346003 is fixed, so we're done, right?
(In reply to comment #5) > 346003 is fixed, so we're done, right? > Not exactly ! If today, one builds bluefish-2.0.1 +gucharmap && does not get docbook-xml-dtd-4.1.2 already installed AND ( (is not tildarch for gucharmap && does not get the test use flag set for gucharmap) OR (is tildarch for gucharmap && does not get the doc use flag set for gucharmap)) Then bluefish build will fail. That is why I suggested for bluefish either RDEPEND gucharmap? ( gnome-extra/gucharmap[test] ) Or RDEPEND gucharmap? ( >= gnome-extra/gucharmap-2.32.1[doc] )
