Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 343943 - app-text/man2html-1.6f does not convert "aq" macro to quot-mark
Summary: app-text/man2html-1.6f does not convert "aq" macro to quot-mark
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High minor (vote)
Assignee: No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-11-03 04:01 UTC by OKUMURA N. Shin-ya
Modified: 2010-11-20 05:33 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
"aq" to apostrophe patch (man2html-apostrophe.patch,453 bytes, patch)
2010-11-03 04:13 UTC, OKUMURA N. Shin-ya
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description OKUMURA N. Shin-ya 2010-11-03 04:01:33 UTC
man2html does not convert "aq" macro of groff to a quotation mark (apostrophe).

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. bzcat /usr/share/man/man3/printf.3.bz2 | man2html | egrep 'printf.*aq'
Actual Results:  
    printf("%aq.2f", 1234567.89);


Expected Results:  
    printf("%'.2f", 1234567.89);

I guess it might be an upstream bug.
Comment 1 OKUMURA N. Shin-ya 2010-11-03 04:13:15 UTC
Created attachment 253003 [details, diff]
"aq" to apostrophe patch

This ad-hoc patch converts an "aq" macro to "'" (apostrophe).
Comment 2 Michael Weber (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-11-11 10:04:12 UTC
+*man2html-1.6f-r1 (11 Nov 2010)
+
+  11 Nov 2010; Michael Weber <xmw@gentoo.org> +man2html-1.6f-r1.ebuild,
+  +files/man2html-1.6f-apostrophe.patch:
+  Revbump to fix bug 343943, thanks to OKUMURA N. Shin-ya
+  <oku.ns@dream.com>. Updated SRC_URI/HOMEPAGE.
+
Comment 3 OKUMURA N. Shin-ya 2010-11-20 05:33:12 UTC
Sorry, this bug is invalid.
The patch is correct but /usr/bin/man2html belongs sys-apps/man, not app-text/man2html.
Which should I reopen this bug as of sys-apps/man, or post new one?