Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 341133 - Stable =net-analyzer/hydra-5.7
Summary: Stable =net-analyzer/hydra-5.7
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Netmon project
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-10-15 16:07 UTC by Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED)
Modified: 2010-10-24 15:35 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-15 16:07:57 UTC
Arch teams, please test and mark stable:
=net-analyzer/hydra-5.7
Target KEYWORDS="amd64 ppc x86"
Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2010-10-15 17:28:23 UTC
Fine on amd64.

For Qa notice i already advise upstream.

missing 'die' on dodoc :)
Comment 2 David Abbott (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-15 22:31:32 UTC
Archtested on x86: Everything fine
Comment 3 Dane Smith (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-16 15:57:51 UTC
Worth noting:
The QA issues
 * QA Notice: Package has poor programming practices which may compile
 *            fine but exhibit random runtime failures.
 * hydra-sip.c:8: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘printf’


 * QA Notice: Package has poor programming practices which may compile
 *            fine but exhibit random runtime failures.
 * hydra-sip.c:8: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘printf’

 * Please do not file a Gentoo bug and instead report the above QA
 * issues directly to the upstream developers of this software.
 * Homepage: http://www.thc.org/thc-hydra/

Only seem to exist when we have -ssl in USE.

I can't seem to get the current stable version to compile with those USE combinations.
Comment 4 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-16 17:28:48 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Worth noting:

You know you should really file a new bug report about that instead of re-purposing this one.
Comment 5 Dane Smith (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-17 16:00:19 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Worth noting:
> 
> You know you should really file a new bug report about that instead of
> re-purposing this one.
> 
I wasn't entirely sure if I should seeing that it's an upstream bug.

Seeing that the current stable doesn't seem to compile in some cases, and that the issue at hand has been reported upstream, I'm going to go ahead and mark this stable on x86.

If you want a Gentoo bug filed on the QA issue, let me know and I will do so.
Comment 6 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-19 23:48:45 UTC
Don't do that.
Comment 7 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-23 01:05:26 UTC
amd64 done. Thanks Agostino
Comment 8 Brent Baude (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-24 15:35:36 UTC
ppc stable, closing