Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 340144 - dev-scheme/hop needs a dependency over dev-scheme/bigloo[web]
Summary: dev-scheme/hop needs a dependency over dev-scheme/bigloo[web]
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Scheme Project
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 329893
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2010-10-08 13:17 UTC by Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED)
Modified: 2016-02-20 17:33 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Build log (hop-2.0.1:20101007-221043.log,1.51 KB, text/plain)
2010-10-08 13:18 UTC, Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED)
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-08 13:17:58 UTC
See attached build log.
Comment 1 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-08 13:18:11 UTC
Created attachment 249928 [details]
Build log
Comment 2 Cyprien Nicolas (fulax) 2010-10-08 13:32:58 UTC
Exact, the web use didn't exist with bigloo-3.3a

DEPEND should be upgraded to:
 >=dev-scheme/bigloo-3.4a[ssl?,threads?,multimedia,web]

and, I think the RDEPEND should be set to:
 >=dev-scheme/bigloo-3.4a[ssl?,threads?,multimedia,sqlite,web]

This DEPS are at least required, but might be not sufficient, I'm testing and will confirm soon.
Comment 3 Cyprien Nicolas (fulax) 2010-11-05 20:45:25 UTC
Forget it, hop-2.0.1 won't compile, because of bug #344303

Seems that hop-2.0.x was only compatible with bigloo-3.3a which was removed from tree in favor of bigloo-3.4a. Bumping to hop-2.1.1 is the only solution I see at the moment.
Comment 4 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-06-25 16:22:32 UTC
Guys we're almost two years later.. what's going on here? If it won't compile, just remove it.
Comment 5 Cyprien Nicolas (fulax) 2012-06-25 17:10:58 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Guys we're almost two years later.. what's going on here? If it won't
> compile, just remove it.

New versions are currently in the lisp overlay. We're just missing the manpower to move them to the tree.
Comment 6 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2012-10-28 16:11:16 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Guys we're almost two years later.. what's going on here? If it won't
> > compile, just remove it.
> 
> New versions are currently in the lisp overlay. We're just missing the
> manpower to move them to the tree.

Maybe it's time to try to become a developer with full commit rights? :)
Comment 7 Cyprien Nicolas (fulax) 2012-10-28 16:16:12 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> Maybe it's time to try to become a developer with full commit rights? :)

I did not think about adding bug 375321 as a dependency of this bug ;-)
Comment 8 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2016-02-20 17:33:33 UTC
removed