Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 33847 - in this app list, choose next. But the next is empty.
Summary: in this app list, choose next. But the next is empty.
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Infrastructure
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] gpackages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High minor (vote)
Assignee: Albert Hopkins (RETIRED)
URL: http://packages.gentoo.org/packages/?...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 65562 82538 83737 85549 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-11-19 10:59 UTC by Barry Voeten
Modified: 2011-11-11 15:59 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Barry Voeten 2003-11-19 10:59:47 UTC 
In the list of app-office packages, below is a link. Usually we get the next 30.
by pressing it:
http://packages.gentoo.org/packages/?category=app-office;name=;offset=
Today, it says:

Sorry, dude. I could not find that package.
Information on the package you requested could not be found. Be sure to check
the fresh ebuilds main page.

I suppose either there are only 30 hits so the next button shouldn't be there,
or, 31 and beyond aren't found. Or so.



Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.http://packages.gentoo.org/packages/?category=app-office
2. next
3. see!

Actual Results:  
Sorry, dude. I could not find that package.

Information on the package you requested could not be found. Be sure to check
the fresh ebuilds main page.

Expected Results:  
more packages listed
Comment 1 Maurice van der Pot (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-12-11 17:19:02 UTC 
It works for me. Barry, is this problem still present?
Comment 2 Barry Voeten 2004-12-12 01:31:03 UTC 
Maurice I believe it is fixed.
Comment 3 Albert Hopkins (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-02-12 13:49:23 UTC 
*** Bug 65562 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Albert Hopkins (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-02-26 10:51:22 UTC 
*** Bug 82538 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Albert Hopkins (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-03-01 17:53:26 UTC 
*** Bug 83737 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Albert Hopkins (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-03-16 16:30:24 UTC 
*** Bug 85549 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Albert Hopkins (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-05-30 09:17:21 UTC 
Wow, it only took me a year and a half to fix this bug!