Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 337461 - [gnome-overlay] gnome-base/gnome-panel-2.31.91: ebuild fails
Summary: [gnome-overlay] gnome-base/gnome-panel-2.31.91: ebuild fails
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] GNOME (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-09-15 09:32 UTC by fkhp
Modified: 2010-09-15 12:53 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
a modified working ebuild (gnome-panel-2.31.91.ebuild,2.61 KB, text/plain)
2010-09-15 09:35 UTC, fkhp
Details
paludis out log file (1284517461-install-gnome-base_gnome-panel-2.31.91:0::gnome.out,11.84 KB, text/plain)
2010-09-15 12:38 UTC, fkhp
Details
ebuild diff (ebuild.diff,816 bytes, text/plain)
2010-09-15 12:42 UTC, fkhp
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description fkhp 2010-09-15 09:32:37 UTC
ebuild fails with gweather-3.0, libedataserverui-3.0:
Comment 1 fkhp 2010-09-15 09:35:51 UTC
Created attachment 247441 [details]
a modified working ebuild
Comment 2 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2010-09-15 11:52:00 UTC
Could you attach build.log showing the failure? Thanks
Comment 3 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-09-15 12:25:11 UTC
and please attach unified diff when modifying an ebuild.
Comment 4 fkhp 2010-09-15 12:38:38 UTC
Created attachment 247465 [details]
paludis out log file
Comment 5 fkhp 2010-09-15 12:42:19 UTC
Created attachment 247467 [details]
ebuild diff
Comment 6 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-09-15 12:53:43 UTC
this is not how porting applications to gnome3 is supposed to be done. I suggest you visit upstream IRC channels and talk to them to see how to contribute about that.
For the gentoo side of things, you adding code that is not using the eclass so user preferences might be completely ignored.

I'm closing this invalid as this is mostly work that needs to happen upstream and we are not including "feature" patch like this.