Bug 336269 – net-wireless/bluez-4.70 version bump

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) 2010-09-06 19:36:55 UTC]

http://www.bluez.org/bluez-470/

[Comment 1 Pacho Ramos 2010-09-07 10:08:34 UTC]

I am aware, but I need a bit of time to see how does it work compiling with USE="-alsa" since I read about some problems with it

[Comment 2 Pacho Ramos 2010-09-07 10:16:13 UTC]

Sorry for the noise, looks to work ok, will work on it as soon as possible

[Comment 3 Pacho Ramos 2010-09-07 11:01:05 UTC]

+*bluez-4.70 (07 Sep 2010)
+
+  07 Sep 2010; Pacho Ramos <[e-mail]> -bluez-4.63.ebuild,
+  -bluez-4.64.ebuild, -bluez-4.67.ebuild, +bluez-4.70.ebuild,
+  +files/bluetooth-init.d, +files/init.d-hidd, metadata.xml:
+  Version bump with updated init.d scripts to make them POSIX compliant
+  (following Michał Górny suggestions in bug #283057), two new USE flags
+  for compiling plugins and some upstream bugfixes that allow us to drop old
+  alsa location patch. Remove old.

Sorry, I forgot to give you credit for reporting :-/, but thanks :-)

[Comment 4 Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) 2010-09-07 12:17:07 UTC]

No problem. Thank *you* for the quick bump!

[Comment 5 Agostino Sarubbo 2010-09-09 23:23:28 UTC]

(In reply to comment #3)
> +*bluez-4.70 (07 Sep 2010)
> +
> +  07 Sep 2010; Pacho Ramos <[e-mail]> -bluez-4.63.ebuild,
> +  -bluez-4.64.ebuild, -bluez-4.67.ebuild, +bluez-4.70.ebuild,
> +  +files/bluetooth-init.d, +files/init.d-hidd, metadata.xml:
> +  Version bump with updated init.d scripts to make them POSIX compliant
> +  (following Michał Górny suggestions in bug #283057), two new USE flags
> +  for compiling plugins and some upstream bugfixes that allow us to drop old
> +  alsa location patch. Remove old.
> 
> Sorry, I forgot to give you credit for reporting :-/, but thanks :-)
> 

Please add " || die " in:
src_configure() later on econf.

All for qa questions :)

[Comment 6 Pacho Ramos 2010-09-10 10:30:29 UTC]

If I don't misremember, econf dies at its own

[Comment 7 Agostino Sarubbo 2010-09-10 17:36:26 UTC]

(In reply to comment #6)
> If I don't misremember, econf dies at its own
> 

sorry for the inconvenience ... I am confused with another:)