Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 329509 - dev-libs/shared-desktop-ontologies is a licensing mess
Summary: dev-libs/shared-desktop-ontologies is a licensing mess
Status: RESOLVED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High minor
Assignee: Gentoo KDE team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-07-23 01:36 UTC by Luke-Jr
Modified: 2011-07-31 17:24 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Luke-Jr 2010-07-23 01:36:14 UTC
It should be "|| ( BSD CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-3.0 ) CCPL-Attribution-3.0 w3c"

But KDE is LGPL, which the CCPL 3.0 licenses aren't compatible with... Is it possible to (based on USE) remove the affected DCMI files (base/dc* I think) without breaking it?
Comment 1 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-07-25 15:31:54 UTC
As we talked on IRC, please open an upstream bug about this issue as it is up to them to fix it.
I'm CC'ing trustees in case they want to contribute with their experience or contact our legal experts.
Comment 2 Luke-Jr 2010-07-25 18:00:54 UTC
OSCAF upstream bug: https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/oscaf/ticket/78

KDE's Bugzilla is down at the moment.
Comment 3 Luke-Jr 2010-08-01 02:13:22 UTC
KDE bug: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=246396
Comment 4 Robin Johnson archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2010-08-15 20:04:57 UTC
Not really a matter for trustees.

Adding in the licenses team instead, but I think it's really for the upstreams to work out between themselves.
Comment 5 Theo Chatzimichos (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2011-01-13 02:44:50 UTC
closing as upstream as we can't do anything (unless we can?) please reopen when they fix their mess
Comment 6 Luke-Jr 2011-01-13 05:23:49 UTC
The LICENSE variable can be fixed, at least. It's been a while, but I also seem to recall that the non-free bits *can* be stripped out, but *possibly* with some ramifications/cripplement. A USE flag seems appropriate.
Comment 7 Andreas K. Hüttel archtester gentoo-dev 2011-01-13 23:41:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> The LICENSE variable can be fixed, at least. It's been a while, but I also seem
> to recall that the non-free bits *can* be stripped out, but *possibly* with
> some ramifications/cripplement. A USE flag seems appropriate.
> 

Patch pretty please?
Comment 8 Andreas K. Hüttel archtester gentoo-dev 2011-07-31 17:24:38 UTC
No response or help from submitter for several months. 
Going back to RESOLVED UPSTREAM.