Bug 326327 – dev-libs/glib-2.24.1 patches for IRIX (and all non-GNUC)

• Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
• Product: Gentoo/Alt

[Description Stuart Shelton 2010-06-30 15:22:25 UTC]

Patch attached to resolve compilation failures in glib test-suite.

Note that this is needed in addition to glib-2.22.4-irix.patch... which not I check I don't appear to have posted previously, so I'll attach that too ;)

The test-suite still fails when performing gvariant tests with:

TEST: gvariant... (pid=5738363)
  /gvariant/type:                                                      OK
  /gvariant/typeinfo:                                                  **
ERROR:gvariant.c:914:check_offsets: assertion failed (member->i == last_offset_index): (0 == 0)
FAIL
GTester: last random seed: R02S08263749ac958688a7d153549868dfa9                                                                                                                                    /opt/gentoo/bin/bash: line 1: 5738636 Terminated              ../../glib/gtester --verbose testing option-context keyfile fileutils printf rand strfuncs string markup-subparser array-test hostutils gvariant mem-overflow
make[5]: *** [test] Error 143
make[5]: Leaving directory `/opt/gentoo/var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/glib-2.24.1/work/glib-2.24.1/glib/tests'

[Comment 1 Stuart Shelton 2010-06-30 15:25:55 UTC]

Created attachment 237051 [details, diff]
glib-2.22.4-irix.patch


Patch to allow glib-2.22+ to build successfully on IRIX.

[Comment 2 Stuart Shelton 2010-06-30 15:28:39 UTC]

Created attachment 237053 [details, diff]
glib-2.24.1-irix.patch


Patch to fix test cases on IRIX, to prevent compiler ERROR notices.

('GVariantSerialised empty = {  };' could have been changed to 'GVariantSerialised empty;', but this causes lots of warnings about using a variable before it has been initialised - and I'm not convinced this is at all what's intended)

[Comment 3 Fabian Groffen 2010-07-02 12:14:10 UTC]

does this mean you need both patches currently?

[Comment 4 Stuart Shelton 2010-07-02 15:10:13 UTC]

(In reply to comment #3)
> does this mean you need both patches currently?
> 

Yes - the first patch is required by glib-2.22.x, whilst both patches are needed for glib-2.24.x.

[Comment 5 Fabian Groffen 2011-12-15 19:20:56 UTC]

We are sorry to close this bug.  We lack the man-power and devotion to support mips-irix in the tree.